Quantcast
Channel: Greenwich Industrial History
Viewing all 561 articles
Browse latest View live

John Hujmpheries House and the LEO 3 Computer

$
0
0
John Humphries House and the LEO  3 computer

By Harry Pearman

John Humphries House in Stockwell Street was the first purpose-built computer centre in Greenwich and the site of a remarkable initiative by local government. 

An early UK computer with an electronic stored memory was the EDSAC machine developed at Cambridge University in 1949. I caught the attention of J. Lyons & Co., who were the managers of a highly successful teashop chain.   They were also innovators of management systems and found that the paperwork of stock control in all of their branches greatly inhibited efficiency. Lyons therefore set about building the first UK computer for business use. It was dubbed the LEO 1 machine; LEO standing for Lyons Electronic Office. It utilised mercury delay lines for memory storage, and ran the world's first regular office job for stock control in 1951. An offshoot company, LEO Computers Ltd., was formed in 1954 to market the technology and LE02 machines were installed in many British offices, including Ford Motor Company, British Oxygen Company and the Ministry of Pensions at Newcastle. 

This success led to the invention of the LEO3 machine. This machine used panels of magnetic washers to store programs and data. Memory size was limited, and programmers had to show great ingenuity in the direct manipulation of memory in order to contain data. Files were stored on magnetic tape reels and data was entered by completing batches of forms, which were punched onto paper tape. Programs were written in a wholly numeric language called Intercede, and the primitive operating system required a great deal of operator intervention. LEO'S principal benefit was the ability to print forms and tabulations at speeds of up to 1,000 lines a minute.

In 1960 these innovations caught the attention of a Greenwich Councillor named John Humphries.  He was instrumental in the creation of a Joint Committee formed from the then Metropolitan Boroughs of Greenwich, Woolwich, Deptford, Southwark, Bermondsey and Camberwell, and this in turn set about the creation of a computer centre, with the result that John Humphries house was built and officially opened. The development of systems was placed in the hands of the Metropolitan Boroughs Organisation & Methods Committee, another Joint Organisation serving the needs of 28 Metropolitan Boroughs and managed by John Dive. 

They created a computer division and it was based at John Humphries The first application was Rate Accounting and this was followed by Payroll, General Ledger Accounting, Job Costing, Stock Control, Creditor Payments, Miscellaneous Debtors, Transport, Housing Rents, Electoral Registration, Library Cataloguing and Land Use Registration. Subsequently The Forest and Bexley Hospitals and the Bloodstock Agency also used the services of the site.

A major change took place in 1965 when London Government was re-organised and the centre then serviced the data processing needs of the London Boroughs of Bexley, Greenwich and Southwark. As computing developed it became financially viable for each local authority to create its own computer installation. The need for a joint installation ceased and the use of John Humphries House was discontinued.

LEO Computers Ltd merged with the computer interests of English Electric in 1963 to form English Electric LEO, and later, English Electric Leo Marconi (EELM). Subsequent mergers eventually found LEO incorporated into SCL in 1968. And the ICL machine range took over new production.

This article appeared in the May 2002 GIHS Newsletter

Deptford Dockyard - oldest remains discovered

$
0
0
SOME OF GREENWICH’S OLDEST INDUSTRIAL REMAINS REDISCOVERED


On 13th May the Times, no less,  announced in an article by Marcus Binney that  ‘Two Deptford  residents with a passion for history have discovered  the foundation stone of one of the first buildings erected by the Royal Navy’ and went on to describe ‘the stone, bearing the date 1513 and the initials of Henry VIII set in an elaborate flame-headed Gothic Arch formed of the finest moulded Tudor brickwork.  This ‘originally stood over the entrance to a magnificent 140ft long storehouse that formed the showpiece of a new Royal shipbuilding yard built by Henry VIII at Deptford just upriver 
from his palace at Greenwich. 

Our readers will know the story of the shipwrights’ palace on the Deptford Dockyard site and how it was taken over and is being restored by Chris Mazeika and William Richards. As part of their researches on the Dockyard they began to look at the naval architect Samuel Bentham, since he had connections with the Shipwrights’ Palace. Samuel’s brother, Jeremy, was the famous economist whose corpse is preserved in a cupboard at University College – not, as it turns out, the only relic kept there. Chris Mazieka was astonished one day, while on his way to lunch, to bump straight into some bits of Deptford Dockyard, itself! 

In the Second World War bombing on the dockyard site had brought to light the old Tudor storehouse within a Georgian storehouse which had been built round it in the 1720s. In 1951 it was decided to clear the whole site for commercial use. The Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings reported that at least 80% of the Tudor brickwork remained as did several original roof trusses together with a mullioned window, Tudor fireplaces and loophole windows.  The London County Council tried to persuade the Admiralty to preserve these remains and the building inspectors advised that it had ‘an outstanding place in naval history as one of the earliest buildings of its class and as one of the starting points of the growth of the Tudor navy,.’  Deptford Council took a tablet which commemorated Peter the Great's visit to Deptford and 20,000 Tudor bricks went to repair Hampton Court.   Photographs existed of the arch and date stone but – as anyone who has attended local history lectures on the subject in Greenwich will know – they had gone into the care of the LCC and then completely disappeared. Until, of course they were found by Chris Mazeika at University College.

The Times article left the mystery there – but a few days later a letter appeared from Negley Harte, Senior Lecturer in Economic History at University College, who said ‘ I can shed light on how the Deptford Dockyard founding stonework and brickwork of 1513 came to University College’..  The hero who rescued it was Sir Albert Richardson the ‘wonderfully eccentric architect’ who was professor of architecture at UCL.  He was given the pieces by the LCC and they were put in what was then the Bartlett School of Architecture – now the Department of Computer Science.

- The only thing the article doesn’t say is how you get in if you want to see these pieces! UCL is not the most accessible of buildings for the general public

Reviews and snippets July 2002

$
0
0
FIREPOWER – have a Royal Salute in the Arsenal on 5th August 2002 at 12 pm.   They have tours of the Arsenal in July and August on Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays 11.30 am and 2.30pm.  They advertise Paintball activities at £1 for 10 shots. On the 190th anniversary of the Battle of Salamanca, BBC Newsnight’s Mark Urban lecture will be based on his book The Man Who Broke Napoleon’s Codes: The Story of George Scovell, - Scovell cracked Napoleon’s Grande Chiffre, leading to Wellington’s finest victory in the Peninsula. Mark Urban is diplomatic editor of the BBC’s Newsnight. The lecture will be held in Firepower’s Breech Cinema 


SECOND SYMPOSIUM  ON  SHIPBUILDING ON THE THAMES AND THAMES BUILT SHIPS NATIONAL MARITIME MUSEUM, 15 FEB 2003
Papers include: William Evans, shipbuilder of Rotherhithe Stuart Rankin. Thames built ships of the Orient Line & Royal Mail Steam Packet Co. - Peter Newall. The General Steam Navigation Company Yard at Deptford - Peter Gurnett. Early steamship machinery installation and repairs on the City Canal, Isle of Dogs - Roger Owen. Coastal shipping and the Thames - John Armstrong. Convicts to Australia. HMS Glatton and HMS Calcutta - Brian Swann. An aspect of warship 




TWO PICTURES OF TUNNEL AVENUE IN THE 1920S
Mary Mills

GLIAS has been given two photographs by Simon Bass. One of them shows what appears to be a factory yard, taken from above, the other shows a crowd of people standing in the road. In both the ground appears to be covered with something black, and shiny.  The crowd are standing in Blackwall Lane in Greenwich – since the distinctive frontage of the Inlaid Lino Works and an advertisement for them can be seen in the background. 
I have a fair idea what is being shown in the pictures – since an account of it appears in ‘A History of the United Molasses Company Ltd.’ (W.A,Meneight 1977).  3,000 tons of molasses had escaped from a tank and was making ‘its ponderous and inexorable way into Tunnel Avenue’. As Mr.Meneight pointed out this was not useful in an area where ‘trams were served by a conductor rail running in a gully between the lines’.   Try as I can in the local papers I cannot find the date of this incident which must have taken place in the late 1920s.
The molasses was used by the Molassine Company which had a riverside factory on the Greenwich peninsula on part of the site now largely covered by Hays and Amylum. In October 1999 we published an article about them in the Greenwich Industrial History Newsletter. This described how the company was founded in 1907 to exploit a Balkan secret formula for animal food – and the company made a number of well known brands including Vims which ‘all dogs love’ and a sphagnum moss and molasses based feed for horses (also used as a plaster by First World War soldiers).  The article included some memories of the works contributed by John Needs and he remembered how Vims was frequently mentioned in Norman Wisdom films and how the yard sweepings were sold as a garden fertiliser ‘RITO’. The company eventually became part of Tate and Lyle. Today there is a large red stone office block in Blackwall Lane which is said to have been built by Molassine – although I have never seen any actual details of this. Behind it are a number of large tanks. I cannot believe that these are the same tanks which stood there in the 1920s and which leaked so dramatically into Blackwall Lane and which Molassine’s publicity department described as a landmark on the river, although it might be a good story to say so.  To local people the most notable thing about the factory was the smell!



GLIAS NEWSLETTER
This edition is the 200thNewsletter and contains a great deal of congratulation and a number of  commissioned articles (no mention of GIHS however much we might consider ourselves a daughter organisation!) .  The issue contains news from all over London – and includes three paragraphs on the Deptford Dockyard (Convoy’s site)  by David and Olwyn Perrett giving some  details of the site’s past history – and a review of the play ‘The Gut Girls’ which has been going the rounds in Lewisham.  There is also a short mention of the Blackheath Hole.

-----------------------


GIHS has now signed up with the British Association for Local History and now receive ‘Local History News’ . .  No mention of Greenwich in the current issue- but that’s something we can work on!

INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE
The Vol.28 Spring 2002 edition contains an article on ‘The Porthcurno Story; this tells above the site of the Museum of Submarine Telegraphy near Lands End, in Cornwall – and a bit about the Museum set up there.  It ends by saying that next time the ‘intend to turn the pages back still further and visit Greenwich on the river Thames where it all began’ – we wait with interest!


CHELSEA SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY RECORDS AND KENT UNDERGROUND RESEARCH GROUP. REPORT 2001. VOL. 27
This excellent publication – which first appeared in the 1960s – details everything you could want to know about underground research in the past year.
Nothing in Greenwich borough appears this time – but there are numerous dene holes and chalk wells in the surrounding area of  North West Kent and some fascinating World War Two sites, some of which are only ‘somewhere in England’

INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY REVIEW
This twice-yearly journal features in its May 2002 edition Jonathan Clarke’s article on Mumford’s Mill in Greenwich. Members might remember when Jonathan came to lecture to us about the mill and his researches into it.  This is a most important article in a prestige journal – hopefully the start of many Greenwich based articles in such places!      

The Guide
The May edition of the Blackheath based freebie magazine ‘The Guide’ featured an article on The Shipwrights Palace in Deptford. This important house – in Lewisham, but right on the boundary and in the bit that used to be in Greenwich – has been extensively renovated over the past few years.  This was the office block and Shipwrights’ house for Deptford Dockyard – on the riverside ands worth a fortune. However two Deptford residents – Chris persuaded Convoys to sell it to them and have begun to restore it.  



CLAY PIPE MAKING IN PLUMSTEAD
John McLean

My grandfather, William Luckett, lived in Palmerston Road, now a crescent, in a terraced house. This had a side entrance to the back garden where he had a ramshackle workshop from which he ran a one-man business manufacturing clay pipes. These were predominantly for the beer industry and later for tobacconists.
I was told that the pipes were given to customers who bought a pint of ‘porter’ in the pubs.  Granddad received four pence a gross for his pipes – from which you will understand that he was unlikely to be a rich man.  He ran the business totally on his own and I can remember seeing rack after rack of pipes of varying shapes and sizes in the roof space above his workshop. 
There was an all pervading smell in the workshop, not at all unpleasant. Presumably this came from the china clay, which he procured from Cornwall and was delivered by rail to Woolwich Arsenal Station.  How on earth he managed to transport such heavy loads I don’t know – I believe he had a pony and trap at one stage but in my time he used ‘shank’s pony’.
As far as I can recall – and  I apologise for my lack of memory – the process involved a mixing system to acquire the correct consistency, a moulding process using cast moulds (iron) with inserts for forming the bowl and a needle to form the airway. Incidentally, I have one of granddad’s moulds with ‘Merry Christmas’ embossed on it.  Whether he had multiple moulds I cannot say, but as a production engineer I would have thought it an obvious way to go.
The final process after ‘fettling;’ or cleaning up the clay that exuded through the joints in the mould, was to fire them in a high temperature open furnace.  Granddad had built this himself and it was a bit like Dante’s Inferno. It had a chain lifted cast iron bucket full of pipes which was lowered into a coke fire. But it all worked and beautiful little and large clay pipes emerged. The chimney of the furnace was incredible. Granddad used anything available to construct it – bricks, bits of glass, rock, porcelain, - you name it, Granddad used it.  How it ever resisted the ravages of nature I do not know but it did.  The only mementoes I have is the mould and two small pots made from 'Arsenal clay’ and ‘Plumstead' clay,
Granddad’s brother, Fred Luckett, was financially much more successful and he became a well known builder in the Plumstead area living in Griffin Road and having a works close to Plumstead High Street. I believe there is a garage in the High Street with the Luckett name above it to this day

 WOOLWICH WATER
By Jack Vaughan

There was a recent planning application for changes to the water tower of the ex-Brook Hospital at Shooters Hill Road plus a possible threat to an adjacent stone building known as Headway House, which fronts onto the road.  Study of Ordnance maps for 1869 and 1890 show the building to be the former ‘Kent Water Company’ pumping station.
The base of the tower itself has coupled with it a massive collection of hydraulic apparatus, probably connected to Headway House, although the tower post-dates the maps mentioned.
We are trying to determine if the House is threatened. We are also taking an interest in the hydraulic arrangements mentioned above. The applicants have refused to leave this apparatus in situ but will offer no objection to them being removed and taken away for possible restoration and exhibition elsewhere.
The pumping station supplied water to the Barracks, the Royal Arsenal, both Royal Dockyards (Woolwich and Deptford) and the Royal Military Academy and is therefore a very significant industrial monument in Woolwich history ….
…… more of this later.

------------------------------


Mike Neill is extremely keen that all members look – and approve or criticise his work on the Royal Arsenal which will be used as part of the display in the new Greenwich Heritage Centre. At the moment this is in the shape of a web site http://www.royal-arsenal.com/ and members are urged to look at it. Mike also says that he will try and produce this as a CDRom for this who do not have web access – or contact him via Greenwich Council.


NO NEWS – we still have no news of the event to mark the centenary of Greenwich Foot Tunnel – last mention from Barry Mason was a note – saying ‘I took today off work and went down to  Redhill to see Binnie, Black and Veatch. The firm founded by the FT engineer, Alexander Binnie. Now a multi-national.  The company is excited about the FT 100th birthday on Sunday 4 August and today confirmed their budget of around £5,000 on the event. Our meeting laid down the ground-rules and outlined who does what. We meet again, on site, in about 1.5 weeks. If you've got time to help with all this, please let me know direct. If, for example, you work at Canary Wharf and tunnel commute, can you firm help too? Tower Hamlets. Are you in? More soon.
Barry


WHAT A PITY – there is to be no celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Last LCC Tram which was driven to the Tramatorium in the Woolwich Road, by Alf Jago, Mayor of Woolwich – amongst scenes of great distress from the general public.  David Riddle points out that Lewisham are to celebrate their ‘last tram’ (but Greenwich’s really was the very last one).

Letters July 2902

$
0
0

LETTERS JULY 2002 

From Jeremy Bacon
 I have a steam car engine. The plate on it says Steamobile built 1962 by N.C. Gregory.  I have been told that he was possibly Apprentice foreman/teacher at J.Stone & Co.(Deptford). Can you help at all?

From Pat O’Driscoll
In the May issue a letter from Paul Harcombe mentions some 'old maps’ at the Land Registry showing a building called the Magnetic Office close to the Rotunda, Woolwich. Unfortunately he does not give the dates of the maps.,
In 1844 the newly created Admiralty Compass Department acquired a house on Maryon Road,  Charlton for testing compasses for the Royal Navy. It  had a large garden in which a wooden observatory was built. The official address of the establishment was ‘The Compass Observatory, Woolwich’.  In 1869 as the Royal Dockyard at Woolwich was closed, the Compass Department moved to Deptford Yard where they remained until 1917.
Could the Magnetic Office have any connection with the time when the Compass Department was at Charlton. I hoped to find an answer in ‘Steady as She Goes: A History of the Compass Department of the Admiralty' by A.E.Fanning., published in 1986 but could find no reference to the Magnetic Office in the area described by Mr. Harcombe. This is not to say that there was no connection. I think that this is a good place in which to begin further investigation.

From Nick Martin
I have just come across the above website and your email address. I wonder  if you have any information on the following.  I am trying to trace details of my great great grandfathers company "Martin  & Co". It was started by Robert Martin with his two sons Alfred and Albert.  Albert left it to his son Ernest, in 1932. They were manufacturers of Horse Hair clippers, later becoming hairdressers clippers, from about 1875 until  at least 1927. Robert Martin lived at No 1, The Village, Old Charlton,  Woolwich from 1881 until 1906 and with his sons, had several business  addresses over the years, including:
1861 - 4 Upper Market Street, Woolwich
1873 - Old Charlton, Kent
1881 - 15 Rectory Place, Woolwich, Kent
1890 - Charles St, Plumstead, Kent (from Patents)
1891-1900 - 229 Burrage Road, Plumstead, Kent
1893 - North Kent Works, Charles Street, Plumstead, Kent (from Patents)
1910-1928 - 4 Nightingale Place, Woolwich Common, Woolwich (business address? - printed on hair clipper sales pamphlet and from patents)
1913 - Owned factory and adjacent land in Woolwich Dockyard. Owned freehold property, address 9, Gildersome Street, Woolwich (from Will)

From Bill Burns
My friend in Australia, Julian Holland, Curator of Scientific Instruments at the Macleay Museum, University of Sydney, is looking for material on S.H. Silver.  

From P.Mumford

I was very interested to see from your website (which I have only just discovered )that someone from English Heritage recently gave a talk on the Mumford mill. My name is Peter J.G. Mumford and the mill was owned by my family . I was taken around the mill just before my family sold it in the early sixties when it was an empty shell having been stripped of its contents by Rank Hovis when their lease ended . I  have many old photographs  of the mill and indeed some original plans (I think) . I will have to dig.  I lived in London for many years and often used to pass the mill but I hav'nt seen it for about fifteen years . I would be very interested in knowing what info you have about the mill, and indeed if you could advise me of the current ownership. I long to see inside it again and would very much like to show my sons what their grand parents and great grandparents and great great grandparents achieved . Does the mill now have a preservation on it.

From Bruce Peebles

I'm from Laverton in Western Australia. I recently acquired a set of old rigging and sail plans for the Cutty Sark  but after many hours of close examination am unable to verify them as correct or to date them in any ways There appears to be no authors name or period on them. They do appear to be of some age due to the discolouring of the paper and hand drawn. Are you able to assist me in the dating and authentication of these plans.

From John Grieg
My cousin from the Hawaiian branch of the family has come up with some interesting papers that might be relevant to the oil milling trade at Griegs’ Wharf in Greenwich. Firstly, it is likely that there could have been considerable changes around 1903 - my great-grandfather was then in financial difficulties and might have had to make economies. Secondly, the estate in Trinidad was  more diversified than just sugar cane, there was land under coconuts and also, certainly in later years, some was used for cocoa cultivation. The coconuts might account for the oil milling and you mentioned a fire in the cocoa store at the wharf in 1895. Thirdly, there was a connection with a line of steamers - this was probably the Trinidad Shipping and Trading Company Limited.  However, this may only have run between Trinidad, New York and Glasgow.
In addition, I have been in touch with the oil milling trade association and they have put me in contact with three people with a knowledge of the history of the trade.  One of them has said that most of the linseed came in from the Baltic rather than from other areas



Harland and Wolfe

$
0
0

MY JOYFUL ADVENTURES AT MESSRS HARLAND AND WOLFE – PART IV
BY JOHN FOX


After spending 18 months with Deafy I was sent for a spell in the machine shop, here I was lucky in not going on the lathes but working with a little Geordie chap, on the shapers, milling machines and a slotters. His having a mouthful of bad teeth (perhaps, due to him, as a child, having been weaned on Newcastle Brown Ale) and always wearing brown overalls is all I can recall about the chap. I do remember that the fellow's ability wasn't highly regarded by the fitters, others in the machine shop would only leave a few thou for the fitter to work with to make the final fit whereas the closest our Geordie measurements came was 16ths. He must have taught me something however, for when a vessel built by Harland's at Belfast sunk on her maiden voyage outside Buenos Aires, I was given the task of drilling hundreds of 2inch holes running together into her now unwanted spare propeller. This done so that wedges could be driven into the slots I'd cut to split the prop into more manageable pieces for ease of transporting the valuable phosphor bronze to be melted down. I did all this on a very big boring machine, when I say big I really mean big, it was huge, a cricket pitch could have been laid out on its bed. But I will admit a fast bowler would have shorten his run up, for it would be a lie to infer that it was as large as all that.

In ship repairing mechanical drawing were very rarely used, if, for instance, a valve stem had to be made you would be given the worn out stem and told to make the new one from that. A  man's experience as a marine fitter and turner told him what clearances were needed and as a skilled man, he would not allow anyone to tell him how to do it. There was a case of a fitter working outside on one of the ships in the dock, who, on direct instructions from his charge hand, had fitted a set of unsuitable water pump rings to a boiler feed pump. The ship nearly blew up its boiler when raising steam to sail and when the cause of the fault was found the fitter was sacked. The chap’s attempt to enlist union help to get his job back failed, for it was universally thought by his fellows that he should never have obeyed instructions to do something he knew to be wrong. I can recall, when apprentice, drilling the shuttle of a Weirs shuttle valve on a pillar drill in the fitting shop. Something went wrong and another fitter, seeing I was in difficulties, told me how to put it right. This friendly help made things worse and when I pleaded to Ernie that is what I was told to do, he burst out. "You don't do everything you’re told, you wouldn't stick you head in the gas oven if I told you to would you."

The last spell of my apprenticeship was spent working outside the North Woolwich site on the ships engines of the many vessels that crammed the Royal group of docks in those days. Here again there was no suggestion that you should work on your own, even though we were on our last year, we would be put to work with a fitter and his mate to be given instruction, not as cheap labour. Many years later, I was a labour officer within a large organisation, my work took me a lot into our apprentice training school, sitting on interview panels, advising on disciplinary matters, negotiating with the trade union, selecting the next year's intake of apprentices etc. I had to listen to a continual complaint from the lads, and the unions, that the boys were being used as cheap labour. They and the union were so effective in this that eventually the school was closed down, I feel sure there is a message there somewhere. Over the negotiations for the closure of the school the dreaded hand of accountants and their mentality hang, they produced figures which proved that the school was not cost effective, based on the ground that the firm did not receive any benefit from the money spent, as the lads, when their apprenticeship was completed, left. But Messrs Harland and Wolfe gave you the sack when yours was over, go and work as a Journeyman with other firms, the apprentice expected to be told, and if, after a couple of years you want to return, we will consider re-employing you. Which to my mind is a more profound way of approaching apprentice training, they did not want a man who only knew their way of doing a job, but, quite rightly, wanted a more rounded employee.

However, to get back to my year of apprenticeship spent working on merchant ships in the Royal Docks. The organisation of the outside section was that the foremen were at H & W's number nine site, which was where City Airport's main building is now; perhaps, over a mile away, the tradesmen on the ship would be working under a charge hand. Of course, there were many other services milling around the ships engine room while it was under repair. A heavy gang who did the rigging and lifting the weighty lumps of machinery that makes up a ships engine. Scalars, whose unenviable task was to climb into the boiler to chip away at the scale that had built up on its tubes and wall. Laggers who maintained the asbestos pipe lagging, invariably small men racked with consumption, (no one had told us of the dangers carried by asbestos fibre, we apprentices regarded it as a great joke when working on a boiler to drop a lump on a fellow apprentice working below). There were the riggers, a holdover from the sailing ship days, whose once important trade now whittled down to rigging barriers around potential dangers. Boilermakers, electricians, plumbers all these adding to the confusion of a ships engine room under repair.

Harland and Wolfe had built many of the ships of the Union Castle Line, whose run was carrying passengers and mail to and from South Africa, most of these ships had Burmister Wain diesel engines, made under licence in Belfast, and the bulk of my remaining time was working in the docks on these 'Castle' boats. A ship’s diesel engine is not to be confused with the engine of your motor car, it is a lot bigger for one thing, an eight cylinder B&W would be about 20 feet high and 45 feet long and many Union Castle liners had two of these. I found working on a ships engine was a hard, dirty, uninteresting job, the memory of perhaps 40 men queuing up to wash their oily hands in a solitary grease encrusted bucket of hot water is still with me. On one occasion, an old fitter was vigorously rubbing at the dirt and grease that covered his hands when I, to be friendly, said. "That's right, Ted, have a good wash now, it'll save you having another one in the morning." Old Ted went spare; it took him ten minutes at least to splutter out his procedure for cleaning up when he got home, leaving me with the impression that Ted had no sense of humour.

A while ago, I was on a conducted tour of the Tower at Canary Wharf and the guide enthused about the new vitality brought to the deserted dockland areas of London and gestured to the derelict buildings below. I think we both saw different scenes below us, in his mind was the exhilarating prospect of money being made. In my mind though, those building were teeming with the ghosts of the many characters with whom we worked. How sad is the scene to anyone who had worked in London docks in their heyday, now the sheds and wharfs are empty, a lifeless shell, like the remains of a crab cast aside when its meat has been extracted.

These were the days of national service and as an apprentice you would not be called up for your turn until you had completed your 'time', but a matter of two months before mine ended I re- ceived notice to go before a medical board at Blackheath Drill Hall. In almost a blind panic I enlisted the full cooperation of Harland's management and to avoid doing National Service I ended my apprenticeship at sea, as a Junior Engineering Officer on the MV Trevelyan, one of the Haines Steamship Company ships, on a trip to Australia.



Article 0

$
0
0

‘The Father of the Siemens Brothers Engineering Society Archive’
Walter John Ford (1920-2014)


John (Ben) Ford
As it has become easier to store and retain historical records, through electronic files and ‘The Cloud’, it appears that many companies seem less inclined to do so than their predecessors, and it often falls to individuals who have the vision and foresight to ensure that valuable archive material is saved for posterity.
One such valuable resource is the Siemens Brothers Engineering Society Archive, and the reason that it exists is in large part due to one man, Walter John Ford.  Because of his understanding of the importance of the company’s history, and his enthusiasm for preserving it, a collection of close to 1,800 items has been gathered together and made available for the benefit of future generations and researchers into the history of a company that, after the Woolwich Arsenal, was the second largest employer in the Greenwich area for over 100 years.  Siemens Brothers was responsible for numerous technical innovations that radically changed and improved the way we live today, as well as making a significant contribution to the Allied efforts in both world wars.
John Ford was born on 8 May 1920 and christened Walter John, although it appears that from an early age he preferred to be known as ‘John’. In March 1936 he joined Siemens Brothers Limited at Woolwich as a trainee draughtsman.  However, the manager of the drawing office decided that there were too many Johns already,so he told John that he would be called Ben, after the South African heavyweight boxer Ben Foord (1913-42), a nickname which stayed with him throughout his career.

Siemens Brothers Works 1935
In late 1936, he transferred to the Telephone Development Department, where he continued to work and study for his Higher National Certificate (HNC) in engineering until the outbreak of World War II.  Ben volunteered for ‘Fire Watch’ duties at the factory, but was quickly transferred to Staincliffe, near Dewsbury in Yorkshire, where he was part of what was called the ‘Radio Department Team,’ which was secretly working on a Radar system then known as ‘Chain Home Low’.  This was a vital technology that contributed significantly to the Allies winning the war.
Ruby's medals
In April 1944,Ben married Ruby Basham. Ruby was a good athlete and regularly won medals at the company’s sports days, and this is probably were she first caught Ben’s eye!



The couple had two daughters, Carol in 1946 and Shirley in 1950.  After the war Ben successfully completed his HNC and returned to the Woolwich factory in July 1945 as Group Leader of the Telephone Equipment Group.In September 1946, he moved to the new ‘Mechanical Division’, where in 1952 he worked with the BBC to devise switching methods for the outside broadcast of the Queen’s coronation. This transmission was a groundbreaking piece of television history!
Ruby's medals
In August 1954, Siemens Brothers had become part of the Associated Electrical Industries (AEI) Group, and by 1955Ben had been promoted to Head of the Technical Services Division, working closely with the other AEI companies.  In 1958, the company’s centenary, HRH the Duke of Edinburgh visited the Works, at which time he was presented with two ‘Centenary Neophones’, one each for Prince Charles and Princess Anne.  Ben was responsible for preparing the presentation case that they were mounted in, but it was Ruby that provided the upholstery skills.




Prince Philip's visit 1958
The following year, Ben became Personal Assistant to the Chairman of AEI, Oliver Lyttleton, 1stViscount Chandos (1893-1972), at corporate headquarters in Grosvenor Place, central London.  During his two-year tenure he visited all 48 of the AEI sites around the country, and it is believed that this is how he obtained his vast knowledge of these companies, their products and their history.
Returning to Woolwich in 1961, he spent three years in Overseas Sales, travelling the world,before becoming Assistant Chief Engineer for Development in 1964, and in 1966 he was appointed Head of Contracts for the newly formed Electronics Division.

When the Woolwich site closed in 1968, Ben joined Standard Telephones & Cables (STC) and moved north to East Kilbride,Lanarkshire, before returning to London in 1971 to live in Hatfield and work at STC New Southgate.  Having learnt that the Siemens Brothers Engineering Society (SBES), still existed, he re-joined in April 1983, giving his first talk to the members on the ‘sticky’ topic of ‘What Ever Happened to Hot Wax’ in April 1984.Ben retired in 1984 and all too soon became his wife’s carer; Ruby died after a long illness in 1997.

Always needing a cause, as soon as he retired,Ben became involved with the Docklands History Group.  This was formed in 1986 with the mission of assembling and retaining archive material and artifacts relating to the fast-disappearing London Docks and surrounding industrial area.  Here he learnt from the archivist at the Port of London Authority Archive in Poplar, and the curator of the new Docklands Museum, being set up in the West India Dock, that as companies closed down or merged, buildings were demolished, and, all too often, past records, deeds, photographs and items of unique historical value were discarded and lost.

His work with the Docklands History Group inspired Ben to find out how much of Siemens Brothers’ history had been preserved in the local archives since the company’s closure. He was alarmed to find that very little existed, and so he determined to do something about it. In November 1991, 23 years after the Woolwich factory had closed, Ben wrote to the one hundred plus membership of the SBES, seeking Siemens Brothers Woolwich archive material suitable for inclusion in a permanent     museum.Over the next ten years Ben accumulated some 1,500 artifacts, until his house was full to overflowing with donations from SBES members. As more items continued to arrive, in 2001 he decided something had to be done with this valuable collection.  six-man committee of SBES members was formed that year, and after three and a half years, the work of this committee resulted in the production of the SBES – Archive Material Catalogue, in June 2004.

Under Ben’s leadership , the committee of David Alexander-Smith, Brian Middlemiss, Bill Philpot, Jim Taylor and John Vamplew, set out with the goal of creating an archive that could represent the achievements and history of the thousands of men and women who worked for Siemens Brothers and its successors over its 105-year tenure of the Woolwich site. In addition to the detailed listing of artifacts the Catalogue contained a brief history of the SEBS, as well as the contact details of the six new custodians of the collection that the team had agreed on.  Delivery of the artifacts to the new custodians was entrusted to Brian Middlemiss and Bill Philpot. A small number of artifacts were given to the Amberley Working Museum (delivered by John Vamplew), the Institute of Engineering & Technology, the Milton Keynes Museum, the Museum in Docklands, and Siemens UK.  However, the vast majority of items, over 80%, were donated to the Greenwich Heritage Centre, now the Royal Greenwich Heritage Trust. 

The project team then disbanded but more donations continued to arrive, so a Supplement to the Catalogue was put together by Brian Middlemiss and Bill Philpot. It was issued in October 2006,adding close to 300 artifacts to the original collection.  Following this Brian Middlemiss researched and compiled a full history of the SBES from 1897 to 2008 issued in October 2009, to accompany the Catalogue and its Supplement.  Again, Ben’s extensive knowledge was invaluable.
As in many parts of Britain, the industrial history of London is rapidly disappearing. After Siemens Brothers became part of AEI and the Woolwich factory was closed in 1968, the site underwent many changes. The majority of the original buildings have been replaced by new development, and little remains to mark the many significant contributions to British industry made by the men and women who worked there.  However, the property developer,U + I, is now undertaking a regeneration project on 5 acres of the Woolwich site, called the Faraday Works,which will preserve and repurpose some of the remaining original buildings.  The redevelopment is named after Siemens Brothers’ long serving and iconic cableship,Faraday, that was designed by Sir William Siemens (1823-83) and was arguably the most import vessel of this class ever built. The U + I project will include a display of the history of the site in a permanent exhibition in the oldest building included in the plan. The material in the SBES archive is an unparallelled resource that will be used in this enterprise.
Ben and his committee wanted to assemble the archive material:‘for safe keeping and for the benefit of future generations and researchers’, and this they achieved,as their work has made secure a large part of the history of one of the most influential engineering companies in British history.  This was only possible through the vision, enthusiasm, tenacity and dedication of Walter John Ford, to whom all industrial and family historians owe a great debt of gratitude.

At the age of ninety-two, Ben moved to Cornwall to live with this daughter Carol, he passed away there on 19 August 2014, aged 94. 
Telephone presentation case

The Siemens Brothers Engineering Society, had its final meeting and dinner on 10 October 2013, hosted by Siemens UK and attended by the surviving membership. The Archive remains distributed over six locations, but the vast majority of it is now held at the Royal Greenwich Heritage Trust Archive in Unit 15 at Anchorage Point off Anchor and Hope Lane, SE77SQ, and can be viewed by appointment.Brian Middlemiss remains the Guardian of the SBES Archive.
;
 Stewart Ash





The Guardian of the Siemens Brothers Engineering Society Archive

$
0
0

The Guardian of the Siemens Brothers Engineering Society Archive
Brian Middlemiss


 If Ben Ford was the Father of the Siemens Brothers Engineering Society (SBES) Archive, the baton has been picked up by Brian Middlemiss, who was a key member of the team that put the collection together and once the team had disbanded, it was Brian that everyone turned to as the  collection’s Guardian and the point of contact for all queries about this important body of work.
Brian was Born in 1942 and joined Siemens Brothers at Woolwich, straight from school, in 1958.By then the company was already part of the AEI Group and had merged with Edison Swan Electric Co, to form Siemens Edison Swan Co Ltd, the year before.  1958was the Company’s centenary year, during which, HRH Prince Philip The Duke of Edinburgh, honoured the Company with a royal visit to both the Woolwich and Blackheath sites. 





Aerial View of the Factory from the CentennialBooklet 1958


Brian served a two-year Sandwich Course, Technician Apprenticeship, after which he joined the Circuit Development Laboratory.There he worked on public switching development projects for overseas markets.   In this role Brian was able to continue his studies and attained Graduate then Associate Membership of the IEE [now the IET].
Over the next few years Brian’s career advanced gaining promotion to Senior Engineer status and joining the then thriving Siemens Ediswan (Woolwich) Engineering Society, which had been formed in 1897.  In 1963 the society name was changed to the AEI (Woolwich) Engineering Society. Always an active member Brian regularly attended their meetings,and during 1967/68 he was trained by Harold Minett,the Honorary Secretary, with a view to becoming the Assistant Honorary Secretary.  Brian sees this as a privileged position for a young engineer that brought him into contact with Senior Managers and, on occasions a light meal in the Directors Dining Room with the visiting speakers.  It was this valuable experience that resulted in his loyal and long-term commitment to the SBES, which continues to this day.

Regrettably this was a short livid experience because,in 1968, the company was taken over by GEC and the Woolwich site was closed.

The closure of the company resulted in formal termination of the AEI (Woolwich) Engineering Society.However, thanks to the hard work of Stan Ventham (1931-96), a former Secretary of the Society and Bill Philpott a former Committee Member, the Society was re-formed as the SBES in order to differentiate it from the German company Siemens AG and its UK subsidiary.  This was based on responses from seventy-five individuals of the original membership of over 500, who had expressed a desire to continue to meet.Something that in hindsight, could be seen as an inspired decision. The re-formed Society held two meetings a year, run by Stan until 1996 when sadly he passed away.  

From then on, Brian took over the reins, something that he and Stan had discussed previously.
Following the closure of the Woolwich Works, Brian joined the part of the General Post Office which was split off under 1969 Post Office Act and became British Telecom.During his17 years in the Technical Development Department,projects included the design and development of Automatic Testers for Common Control Telephone Exchange Systems; ongoing development of the National Trunk Exchange Switching System and a member of the project management team for the implementation of small Local Digital Telephone Exchange Systems.  Further career advancement during this period enabled Brian to gain Corporate Membership of the IEE, and finally Chartered Engineer status.  

In 1985 he transferred to Major Systems Procurement, initially as its first Divisional Quality Manager.  The following year he joined a small team undertaking Supplier Capability Assessment, formed mainly to assist in the roll out of Digital Telephone Exchanges.  From 1993 onward he led the team, in its expanded role,having a worldwide remit to match BT’s global expansion aspirations.  Brian took early retirement in 1996.

His early retirement coincided with Stan’s request for him to take over running the SBES, which he did up to its closure in October 2013.  Thanks to Stan and Brian, the re-formed Society had continued meeting twice a year for an incredible 45 years after the closure of the Company.  It was only the average age of the remaining members and travel problems which led to the final closure. Even then enthusiasm to continue meeting, amongst the remaining membership, still existed.

During the period 1996 to 2013 the SBES was very active, and its activities were funded by Siemens UK plc. This sponsorship came about when Siemens discovered, by accident,the existence of SBES in 1994.  The SBES hosted talks at virtually every meeting and arranged engineering visits to places of interest, maintaining the Society’s traditions. The SBES also undertook many investigations resultant on enquiries from members of the public. 

Perhaps the most significant achievements of the re-formed society in its latter years was the formation of the SBES Archive, now held by the Royal Greenwich Heritage Trust [formerly The Greenwich Heritage Centre].  Thanks to the efforts of ‘The Father of the Archive’ Ben Ford, archive material [documents and hardware] had been collected over some 10 years and the initial catalogue was produced in June 2004.  This was followed by a Supplement in October 2006; between the two documents in the order of 1800 artifacts were catalogued.

After the production of the catalogues, it was suggested that a history of the society should be produced and in response Brian researched and wrote ‘The History of the Siemens Brothers Engineering Society 1897 – 2008’, published in October 2009.  In 2008, the SBES celebrated its 40th anniversary, at which time many thought that, given the age of the membership it would come to an end.   However, enthusiasm to continue prevailed, and the SBES continued for another five years,so Brian produced a Supplement to cover the last years of the SBES from 2009 – 2013, this was published in July 2015.   100 copies of all four of these documents were printed, thanks to Siemens UK plc., and given wide circulation.

The front cover of all the Archive Catalogue documents carry the words:
“The archive material detailed in this catalogue has been donated by members of the Society over recent years and is now distributed among new holders for safe keeping and for the benefit of future generations and researchers.”

Brian can be rightly proud of achieving this objective and realising Ben Ford’s dream.  In between visiting his two daughters, with his wife Jacky,and spoiling their four grandchildren, Brian remains active in his role of Guardian of the SBES Archive. He is currently working closely with the U + I team,helping to locate specific information in the SBES Archive and to ensure that the heritage elements of the Faraday Works regeneration project are historically accurate and in line with goals of the SBES members.


Stewart Ash

MoD Materials Quality Assurance Directorate

$
0
0
MoD Materials Quality Assurance Directorate 
Bruce Blissett

Introduction. 
In November 1966 I joined the General Chemicals Laboratory in MQAD as an industrial analytical chemist experienced in the quality control of a wide variety of materials and chemical products.  The General Chemicals Laboratory was one of a group of laboratories on Frog Island forming the then named Directorate of Chemical Inspection.  This paper gives a very brief history of the Royal Arsenal, the Directorate and an outline of just some of the work undertaken in the General Chemicals Laboratory.

The Origins of the Royal Arsenal, Woolwich.
The launch of the ship Henri Grace ã  Dieu in October 1515, marked the beginning of the Royal Dockyard at Woolwich which was so important in the founding of King Henry VIII's navy.  A rope yard serving the dockyard was built between 1573 and 1576 by the builder Thomas Allen and was situated on land adjacent to the present day Beresford Street.  Thomas Allen also erected a store house close to the Thames shore and Bell Water Gate.  There was also a slipway, wharf, warehouse and gunyard where ordnance from ships could be housed while awaiting reallocation.

During the conflict with the Dutch, the storehouse on the gunwharf was found to be too small and in 1671, the Crown bought an old manor house named Tower House (later named Tower Place) and its associated land in order to accommodate a store keeper and to build a powder house and store for saltpetre (potassium nitrate).  The purchase of Tower Place together with 31 acres of land for use as an ordnance storage depot really marks the beginning of what was to become the Royal Arsenal.  The Royal Arsenal expanded in a piecemeal fashion until in 1907 it was 3 miles long and up to 1 mile wide.

A Brief History of the Directorate.
During the seventeenth century, the office of the Ordnance Chemist was established which, in the latter part of its existence, served in the Royal Arsenal until it was abolished in 1826.  Following the discovery of guncotton (nitrocellulose) and nitro-glycerine in the 1840s however,  the need was felt in the War Office for the expertise of a chemist and in 1854, a young man named Frederick Abel who, two years earlier had succeeded Michael Faraday as Professor of Chemistry at the Royal Military Academy at Woolwich, was recruited into the post of Ordnance Chemist.  The title Ordnance Chemist was later changed to War Department Chemist.

The War Department Chemist was responsible for the inspection of an extraordinary range of materials including gunmetal, saddlery, hay and 'energetic materials' such as gunpowder,.  Frederick Abel (later Sir Frederick Abel) was noted for his major role in the development of cordite (a mixture of nitro-glycerine and nitrocellulose) as a propellant for ammunition.  He devised a heat stability test for explosives which, to my knowledge, is still in use today and Abel's flash point apparatus fortesting the flammability of flammable liquids such as petroleum products.  Abel's flash point test using apparatus to his original design remains the reference method for testing low flash point fuels to the British IP (Institute of Petroleum) and American ASTM test methods.  In 1888, Sir Frederick Abel GCVO, KCB was succeeded by Dr. W. Kellner. In 1904, a separate Chemical Research Department was created and in 1909, the War Department Chemist became part of the Armament Inspection Department under the new title Chemist, Inspection Department. At the start of the First World War, the department had only 12 staff but this number needed to be increased to more than 150 with new laboratories opening in other parts of the country.  The range of materials for which the department was responsible also greatly increased due largely to the advent of chemical warfare.  In 1917, the title Chemist, Inspection Department was again changed to Directorate of Chemical Inspection and was changed yet again to War Department Chemist in 1920.  The rearmament programme of 1935 led to the recruitment of more staff at Woolwich and after more than 80 years service, the laboratory block (Building 20), still largely to the original design of Sir Frederick Abel was considered inadequate and new laboratories were built on Frog Island where the Arsenal canal once formed a loop.  There they remained until 1971 when the buildings were evacuated to allow the land to be handed over to the Greater London Council.  The laboratories were finally housed in a badly designed and cheaply built modern laboratory block.

In 1939, the department's name was changed to Chief Chemical Inspectorate and during the Second World War staff numbers exceeded 1600. 1952 saw yet another name change to Director of Chemical Inspection or Chemical Inspection Directorate (CID).  Gales of laughter would often be heard at the other end of a telephone line if someone answered, "Hello, this is the CID!".  The never-ending title changes continued, for in 1970, we became known as the Quality Assurance Directorate (Materials), abbreviated to QAD/Mats.  This title was considered too easily confused with that of our sister department; Quality Assurance Directorate (Ordnance), abbreviated to QAD/Ord and in 1972 we were renamed Materials Quality Assurance Directorate, abbreviated to MQAD.

MQAD provided technical expertise and quality assurance of material supplies for the army, navy and air force.  It had a chief director and three assistant directors.  Each assistant director headed a division and these were: E (explosives), P (polymers) and G (general).  Each division was sub-divided into branches so that E division had two branches covering explosives and propellants while P division had branches covering papers, rubbers, plastics materials, paints and adhesives.  The General Division had branches covering metals, petrol, oils and lubricants, and general chemicals which was the branch and laboratory in which I worked.  There were also the Analytical Development laboratories which assessed new analytical techniques and a Central Packaging Unit situated in Plumstead.

The General Chemicals Laboratory, like Sir Frederick Abel's original laboratory, was responsible for analysing or otherwise testing an enormous range of materials.  More than one thousand different items were covered including various leathers, insecticides, pesticides, insect repellents, desiccants, sealants (lutings), bleaching powder, camouflage cream, soap, detergents, disinfectants, inks, corrosion inhibitors, derusting solutions, anodizing solutions, plating solutions, solder fluxes, degreasing compounds, ullage and water finding pastes, abrasive blasting grits, shell linings, respirator filters, organic and inorganic wood preservatives, polishes, wax and edible candles, aircraft thrust augmentation fluids, runway de-icing fluids, solvents and pure chemicals.  Samples for chemical analysis from the other branches of MQAD would also be tested and the laboratory provided a free analytical service for the whole of the MoD. (to be continued)

Greenwich Foot Tunnel centenary

$
0
0
GREENWICH FOOT TUNNEL CENTENARY

By Myles Dove

As forecast in the May issue of GIH there was a celebration on Sunday 4 August 2002 to mark the completion of the Greenwich Foot Tunnel exactly one hundred years earlier. It was designed for the London County Council by Sir Alexander Binnie who had been responsible for the much longer Blackwall Tunnel, completed in 1897.  Like the foot tunnel it is still in use and celebrated its centenary five years ago.  When Greenwich Foot Tunnel was first completed, access was only by stairway for the lifts were not in operation till January 1904.  In that year 4 million people used the foot tunnel, increasing to over 6 million by 1915.  Now, with the Docklands Light Railway extended to Lewisham, there is another way to cross under the river but many walkers still use the foot tunnel and, of course, most cyclists have to use it because only fold-up cycles can be taken in the DLR. On the SUSTRANS national network of cycle routes the Greenwich foot tunnel is on route 1 linking Dover with Inverness so it is especially important for cyclists that this historic landmark is kept open and the two lifts kept working - even if they have to walk through it because cycling in it is forbidden

The idea for the foot tunnel centenary came from Greenwich Cyclists, whose co-ordinator, Barry Mason, first contacted the two London boroughs sharing the operating costs for the tunnel - Greenwich and Tower Hamlets - and the day began with an address by the Mayor of each borough in the open air near the south entrance. They were followed by an entertaining and informative talk by Chris Binnie, in tall hat and gear that might have been worn by his great-grandfather who designed the tunnel and whose name lives on in the title of the present-day consulting engineers, Binnie, Black & Veatch. It was with their support that the centenary event was staged and they have a wide-ranging practice with projects in the Americas and Australasia as well as in Europe.  Some of these were on view when the event transferred from rainswept Cutty Sark Gardens to the upper level of Queen Anne's Court in the University of Greenwich, by the river.

Here, the innovative techniques used in the first Blackwall Tunnel and in Greenwich Foot Tunnel were explained by Chris Binnie, who has retired from practice as a water engineer but is still actively involved as chairman of a committee for improving water quality in the River Thames.
In both tunnels the technical problems of driving a horizontal shaft through mixed water-bearing strata had to be overcame by using compressed air to restrain water penetration and in addition this was partially slowed by a temporary sealing layer of clay on the river-bed.   Construction of the foot-tunnel started with the sinking of a shaft on the north bank (known then as Poplar now Tower Hamlets) and as work went on compartments were fitted to keep up air pressure in work areas while allowing for separate movements of men and materials through the air locks.  Eight-hour shifts were worked with 45 minute breaks in vacating the workings so as to avoid compression sickness.  For most of the way the tunnel dig advanced 10 feet every working day decreasing to 5 ft. per day when they struck a layer of "open ballast" (pebbles near the Greenwich end.  As recorded by the LGC the foot tunnel is 1217 ft in length external diameter 12'9", internal 11'0" and it was formed with cast-iron segments bolted together, lined with concrete and faced with white glazed tiles.  The top of the tunnel is 55 ft below low water level and there are 88 steps at the northern end on the Isle of Dogs and 100 steps at the Greenwich end.  In the early years operating times for the lifts were from 5 am to 11 pm.  Currently they are 7 am – 1 on Sunday Monday - Saturday and 10 am - 5. 50 pm in the Greenwich foot tunnel (different time apply in the Woolwich foot tunnel-l' Both Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels are open all day and night with access by stairways when the lifts are not being opera!

However it is more restful to enter the  brick-clad and glass-domed enclosure (Grade I on the Statutory List of Buildings of Special Architectural or Historic Interest)  in Cutty Sark Gardens, listen for the whirr of winding gear and go in a spacious timber panelled lift, instead of struggling down or up stairways with bike or buggy. Timing was a critical factor when Greenwich Cyclists ended the event with a circular ride via Woolwich and the Royal Docks, returning through the Isle of Dogs to reach the Greenwich Foot Tunnel and sing out a birthday greeting before the lifts stopped working at 5. 50 pm.

In Greenwich Local History Library at Woodlands, comparative tunnelling methods are described in a paper read at the Institution of Civil Engineers in 1902 - see: ICE minutes for 25 March 1902 pp 1-24, from which these illustrations of the Greenwich Foot Tunnel are reproduced with due acknowledgement of library staff assistance. The location plan has the original layout of the riverside, with a Ship Tavern where later the Cutty Sark was brought to rest and on the north side of the river, the Great Eastern railway lines and sheds can be seen by the footway leading to the tunnel entrance; one of the vertical sections through the shaft shows the separate tubes and air-locks for men and material

Reviews and snippets September 2002

$
0
0
Reviews and snippets September 2002


Civil Engineering Heritage Series – London and the Thames Valley by Denis Smith. (GIHS members will remember Denis’ lecture to us last year on Henry Maudslay)  

GLIAS NEWSLETTER – the August 2002 edition includes two articles by Mary Mills (both previously reported in this newsletter) – The Molasses Incident Photos and What’s Under Blackheath Hill.

BYGONE KENT– The July 2002 edition contains three articles of interest to Greenwich historians:  Mary Mills’ article on a geological walk around Westcombe Park, Memories of Dene Holes in NorthWest Kent by A.J.Drew – but – most importantly -  ‘Munitionettes: Women Workers in the Royal Arsenal, Woolwich’ by Barbara Ludlow.  In addition there is a review of ‘A fisherman of Greenwich’ by Julie Tadman (covered in our last edition) and a letter from Mary Mills adding some ship names to her earlier article on Maudslay, Son and Field.

Crossness Engines Trust– The Crossness Record of Summer 2002 contains the usual lively selection of articles on sewage and related topics. These include – an article on toilets in China – a review of a book ‘Now Wash your hands!’ by Stephen Arnott – an article on roof alterations in the 1890s  - and job titles at the Southern Outfall.  In addition ‘News from the Octagon’ reports on the progress of work on site to date.


A Post Excavation Assessment of Archaeological Works at Vic Industrial Park, West Street, Erith. This study was commissioned by Wimpey Homes and covers a large section of the Erith riverside – more details in due course.

SOUTH EAST LONDON MERCURY – both Chairman Jack Vaughan, and Secretary Mary Mills were quoted in a recent edition of the Mercury.  Mary had been asked to comment on the 100thbirthday of the foot tunnel – and was unaware when she made the comment that an event had been held to mark it. Jack was asked to comment on the endangered lock on the Arsenal Canal – I think I read it that Jack wants it restored – or is it the whole Arsenal he wants restored? (or course!)

INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE.   The Summer 2002 article is a bumper one for Greenwich. First of all is a wonderful article by our member, Peter Jenkins, on Webster and Horsfall.  – who made the wires, which went into the cables, which went across the Atlantic on the Great Eastern …….  The issue also contains another article from Mary Mills on Joshua Taylor Beale and his son John, Engineers on the Greenwich Peninsula, and a reprint of the clay pipes article in our last issue.

TAKEN FOR A RIDE? By Iris Bryce
Whilst driving to Cromford, Owen and I took a sudden decision to detour to Crich and visit the Tramway Village. Imagine our delight on seeing a large banner at the entrance which read 'TAKE A RIDE ON THE LAST TRAM IN LONDON. CELEBRATE JULY 5th 1952.   We couldn't believe our luck in visiting on July 5th 2002!   We collected our two old pennies along with our maps and brochures and within a few minutes we saw a number 38 tram with the destinations GREENWICH -  EMBANKMENT at the front. Eagerly we climbed aboard and off we went, however there was something that didn't seem quite right somehow and it wasn't until we came to the end of the line that I realised what it was. The conductor jumped off to move the overhead pole round in order for us to return to base! That's what was wrong - we did not have overhead poles on the trams on our routes. On the way back we had to stop when we reached a single track and wait for the tram coming the other way. The driver and the conductor came and sat down with us and gave a talk on how the Crich Tram Village had started. They asked for any questions and not one of the other four passengers had anything to say, so I mentioned that I had probably had many rides on this 38 tram as I travelled that route to school and to work for many years. I also added that in those days it did not have the electricity supplied by overhead lines. There was a brief silence, then the driver said, 'I'm glad there's only four of you here, you see you've caught us out. This tram was in fact taken out of service in 1936 as it was no longer worth repairing. For-the next thirty years it was used as a garden shed. When the Tram Village was started the lady it belonged to gave it to us and it is now actually made of two trams. The top is built up from a Leeds tram and the bottom is part of the original No. 38. Your part of London were not allowed to have overhead wires due to some kind of bye law I think, but of course we had to convert this in order to include it in the programme. He smiled and said, 'We never expected anyone like you to be here on this day of all days'

I had another query however, and said 'I always thought the last tram was a No.40. I'm sure that was the one photographed on the Kentish Independent and Kentish Mercury, and I took my 5 year old daughter to Beresford Square in Woolwich to watch the No. 40 go by'. The driver gave a sigh, 'Take a good look in the glass cases in the Exhibition Hall, you'll see that you are right again. We couldn't get that one as it is believed it ended up at the tram graveyard in Charlton.' I did look in the glass cases, and there was the newspaper cutting about the No. 40 tram from Abbey Wood to New Cross Gate.. However I did learn something. I did not know and still do not know where the Tram Graveyard was in Charlton.

I don't know if I'll be made welcome at Crich again, but I can certainly recommend it as a well worthwhile visit.


MARC BRUNEL IN WOOLWICH
By Jack Vaughan

I have been recently trying to uncover connections between Marc Brunel – father of Isambard Kingdom Brunel – and the Royal Dockyard, Woolwich.  Over the years there has been much talk and speculation about a link – but, disappointingly, I have failed to find anything.  Of course there is a connection via the ships’s running-blocks, thousands of which would have been used in the large 
wooden warships constructed at Woolwich in the early 1800s – up, in fact, until the yard was closed in 1869.

There is of course a 'block’ connection between Marc Brunel and Henry Maudslay – who was born in Woolwich. The subjects is well covered in biographies. Marc’s prolonged adventures with sawmills in 1808 at the Royal Arsenal Woolwich are also covered in biographies. I can say that Marc's original drawings of these mills are held by the PRO. I obtained a set before they moved to Kew and I hope they have survived. Some models of the block machine are in possession of the National Maritime Museum.



GREENWICH ENGINES ON DISPLAY

The following engines on display in Museums and fire stations were made in Greenwich by Merryweather at their Greenwich High Road site:

Alresford, Hants   1892 Merryweather steamer kept in the local fire station.
Banbury – in the fire station is an 1890 Merryweather ‘Double Vertical’ steamer which once served Blenheim Palace, and now wins prizes at local shows.
Beaulieu, National Motor Museum – has a Merryweather Valiant which has appeared in a number of films.
Bressingham Steam Museum – displays a Merryweather Valiant.
Bridport - the local fire station displays a preserved Merryweather ‘Greenwich Gem’.
Kirkaldy - the local fire station displays a 1902 Merryweather machine.
Glasgow Transport Museum – a Merryweather ‘Greenwich’ is on display.
Leiston – a Greenwich Gem is on display at the Garrett Long Shop Museum
Science Museum – has the third engine built by Merryweather – Sutherland.  In 1863 it won first prize in a trial of fire engines at Crystal Palace.
Maidstone Town Museum – has a 1902 Merryweather Valiant.
Newcastle on Tyne Museum of Science and Engineering has on display a Merryweather Metropolitan. The machine won many prizes in Europe and was later used for training.
Oxford – a Merryweather Metropolitan of 1887 is on display in the City fire station.
Redruth – displayed by the West of England Steam Engine Society is a Merryweather Double Horitzontal.
South Yorkshire Fire Museum – displays a Merryweather Valiant.
Shropshire Fire Brigade HQ, Shrewsbury -A Merryweather Valiant is displayed in front of the building.
Wolverton Museum of Industry and Rural Life has a Merryweather Greenwich Gem.
Mulhouse, France – the Musee de Sapeurs Pompiers has a 1868 Merryweather machine
Transport Museum of Ireland – display a Merryweather machine.
Feuerwehr Museum, Salem, Germany – have an 1888 Merryweather engine.
Museum of Fire, Sydney – has a Merryweather Valiant
Power House Museum, Australia – another Merryweather on display
Fire Service Historical Society New Zealand – another Merryweather.
Southward Car Museum, New Zealand – an 1888 Merryweather.
Museo "Jose Luis Claro Cruz", Santiago, Chile – has an 1869 Merryweather machine. And an 1872 machine.
Tokyo Fire Museum – another Merryweather exhibit.

-

Letters September 2002

$
0
0
Letters September 2002


From Beryl Mason
I am writing as a follow up to your article on Molassine – the red brick building ‘offices’ on Tunnel Avenue in fact used to be flats.  I used to deliver to that building when I worked for Boots.

From Jeremy Bacon
I am doing some quick research into the 1st Brighton Run 14th November 1896. In the list of entries sent to the press appears:- No 54  Messrs Penn's steam-carriage. On the day only 33 cars started, and No54 did not put in an appearance. Have you any record of Penn's steam-carriage in 1896? Possibly still extant on the 1899 takeover?
SAVE THE BRIGHTON RUN

From Geoffrey Belcher
Greenwich Development Agency have grant -aided a shopfront at Masterwe/Printing Ltd, 115 Trafalgar Road. At basement level in the rear is a brick oven about eight feet wide. It doesn't seem to me to be earlier than 19th cent but it is close to the former Royal Palace and is certainly commercial in scale. Could it have an earlier beginning? The owners are busy demolishing it but have taken photographs. They have offered any bits to those interested including the Borough Museum

From Nishani Kampfner 

Thank you for your interest in SS Robin – now berthed in the West India Dock. . There is a website - www.ssrobin.com  which has useful information about the volunteer group... Just thought we'd let you know a few recent developments at SS Robin  - we’re delighted to announce that Jim Fitzpatrick MP has agreed to become the project's Patron. We're inviting new Trustees to join the Board - do let us know if you’d be interested. We've redesigned our website at www.ssrobin.com to include our team structure and new identity. Should you require any further information on SS Robin, the world's oldest remaining complete steamship, and her conversion into a photography gallery.

 From David Perret

I have just heard that the GLIAS database our entry for the AIA awards has been awarded the AIA main award for this year. Congratulations to all involved  - particularly to Chris Grabham whose idea it was, and who has spent so much time on it.

(Chris is, of course, also a GIHS member and will be coming to speak about the database at our AGM)

From Alan Glass

I am trying to research a Brass plate found on a beach. The plate is Oval about 4 inches across marked No 710 Henry Sykes Ltd Engineers Southwark St London Owner & Leasors. The plate was found in the mid 1950,s by a very old friend who is now very old indeed, he has wondered for years what it was and I hope that you may be able to give him an answer.  Thank you very much, sorry to be a nuisance but I would like to solve the riddle for old Tom.

 From Ed Feege
I live in Maryland in the USA.  I stumbled across your web site when doing research on a ship reportedly built by Charles Lungley of Deptford Green. As far as I've been able to discern, the ship, named Pevensey, was built sometime in 1864. She was charted by Stringer, Pembroke & Co. (an incarnation of Galbraith Pembroke and Co. still in existence today) to run through the Union blockade between Bermuda and Wilmington, North Carolina during the U.S. Civil War. Her luck ran out on 9 June 1864, when she her crew ran her aground while being pursued by a Union warship. They also rigged her boilers to explode rather than let her fall into Union hands. Today, parts of the wreck can still be seen at low tide in the surf at Pine Knoll Shores in North Carolina. A local diving team has been surveying the wreck as their time and funds permit. I wondered whether you or any members of the Greenwich Industrial Society might know anything about Mr. Lungley's "offspring" such as Pevensey and her sister, Nutfield, which also ran the blockade. Also, would you be able to suggest a good source to provide more in-depth information on Mr. Lungley's shipyard? Any information you might have would be most appreciated.

From Louise Mac Donald
I am looking for ANY information on a Union Jack flag I recently acquired. I'm told it is a stern jack flag from a large ship as the flag measures 9ft 8in by 21 ft long and is stamped on the end (1811 Jack). I'm not sure if you can help me but if you can't would you please send any information where I can research the history of this flag. My father spent 35 years in the Navy and was buried at sea. He also left me with a curiosity for all things pertaining to ships and history.

From John,
I know this sounds like a strange request but I'm trying to find a record of a suicide, which would have happened in Plumstead High St between the mid 1800s to early 1900s. I know it was a girl who hanged herself & I know It happened in or around the now known as Electric Orange Pub which is near the police station. This is very important to me & if you have anything on your records I'd be grateful if you could find the information I need I promise I'll fill you in.

From Brian Strong (GLIAS Secretary)
I have been contacted by William Richards, who is acting with a group of individuals concerned about the threat to demolish Pain's Wharf (John Penn, engineers and boilermakers) and Borthwick Wharf (cold storage building designed by Sir Edwin Cooper), which he described as the last two buildings of distinction on the Deptford Waterfront except the Master Shipwright's House. He has been in touch with Paul Calvocoressi at English Heritage, who was supportive of a proposal to spot-list, but a good case needs to be made.  I am attaching information on the two sites which has been forwarded to me.

Borthwick Wharf
The exterior has been little altered since Edwin Cooper completed it in 1934. There are some small additions in fletton bricks and the riverside canopy has been partially removed. Borthwick Wharf is visible from the top of Greenwich Park and some distance inland and proudly and vigorously announces Deptford's industrial past.
Edwin Cooper was, a RIBA gold medallist, he succeed Lutyens as president of the Incorporated Association of Architects and Surveyors, Treasurer of the Royal Academy, an honorary member of Lloyds and his works include the listed PLA headquarters at Tower hill, the recently restored Devonport nurses home in Greenwich and the Cooper building now occupied by Greenwich University, the royal college of Nursing in Cavendish Square, Marylebone Town Hall, The British Red Cross memorial, The Star and Garter home in Richmond.
His obituary in The Times credited him- "his tastes being for the bolder effects of classical form, skillfully adapted to modern functional demands."

PAYNES WHARF-DEPTFORD SE8
Payne's wharf is a former marine boiler works built for John Penn and sons in the mid-nineteenth century. It sits on the waterfront at Deptford between two other buildings of significance; the grade II listed Mastershipwrights house and Sir Edwin Coopers building for Borthwick and sons. As a group these three buildings offer a panorama of three centuries of industry on the Deptford waterfront. As separate buildings each has its own distinct architectural form and integrity.
Payne's Wharf is a nineteenth century building, specially built for the world renowned J Penn and sons, the worlds finest marine engine builders.
The riverfront is made up of six vast Italianate arches in brick with deep stucco detailing, prominent decorative keystones and, until very recently, a scrolled name panel above the arches. The scale and quality of this building is not typical of Thames wharfing, the arches being built to give access to the river for lifting boilers into ships or barges in the river. The building is largely constructed of London stock brick with cast iron windows, wooden loading bay doors to the south.
It is not known who designed the building, but one possibility is that Penn himself had a hand in it. The west and south elevations are less dramatic than the river frontage, though the south has a curious gabled roofline. The western boundary forms the walls to the ancient upper Watergate stairs, where the ferry to the Isle of Dogs departed.
The scale of Payne's Wharf is compatible with the immediately adjacent master shipwright's house, both being three stories above ground.
John Penn and sons' amalgamation with Thames Ironworks led to the construction of the worlds first "iron clad", HMS Warrior, now restored by the maritime trust in Hartlepool. This partnership also produced the early dreadnought battleships. The building is listed by the Greenwich Industrial History Society as an "industrial highlight".
The building is currently used for document storage by Hays information management, and is situated in the London borough of Greenwich.
Fast track listing is sought because planning consent for demolition may be sought and secured.

From Len Chapman

RMS QUEEN MARY's PROPELLERS
A couple of years ago I bought an apartment at Lockes Wharf on the Isle of Dogs. The Site Manager at that time told me the site had previously been a foundry and the propellers for the rms Queen Mary had been cast at that foundry.  Coincidentally I had sailed as an Engineer Officer on the QM so my technical interest was aroused.  I contacted the University of Glasgow who hold all the QM archives but they could only identify that the propellers were manufactured by Stone Manganese Bronze. The order documents did not state where the propellers were produced.  I have been looking for other sources of information without success until I located your website. That makes reference to J Stones and Co Deptford as the producers of the propellers for the QM. That appears to contradict the information the University of Glasgow has, unless J Stones was part of the Stone Manganese Bronze Company.  I wonder if your members have the answers to the following questions:  Were the rms Queen Mary's propellers supplied by J Stone? If so when (they may have supplied replacement propellers)? Did J Stones have a foundry located at Lockes Wharf? I know the University of Glasgow will be interested in the answers!
Incidentally I did visit the Age Exchange Reminiscence Centre a couple of years ago. I encountered it purely by chance. I used to sail from the Royal Albert Dock in the "good old days" so the exhibits brought back many memories.  I went to Poplar Technical College as an Engineer Cadet but did not get to know Greenwich until I bought the apartment. I did regularly sail past Greenwich on my way to berth alongside Butlers Wharf and Shadwell Basin at a time when Docklands meant ships and cargoes and not high rises and people!
(Mary Mills points out that the Queen Mary’s anchors were made at Stone Foundry in Charlton – see Wonders of World Engineering Part 23). 

From Cllr. John Fahy

Making the Most of Our Civic Heritage
English Heritage have recently produced a consultation document setting out some guiding principles for decision-makers. I believe the time is now opportune to establish an Advisory Group of interested residents who can help the Council in supporting its own heritage buildings but also to work with others in creating a stronger voice for Greenwich.
I have been extremely encouraged with the initial response to my suggestion and I now write formally to invite you to consider this proposal and invite you to nominate a member of your Group to join this advisory group. Once I have received a response hope to convene a meeting in early September. I look forward to hearing from you in due course.
The Council owns the following listed sites:
Charlton House and  Stable buildings
Woolwich Town Hall
Woolwich Old Town Hall
23/25 Woolwich New Road
Clockhouse, Woolwich Dockyard
Woodlands, Mycenae Road
Shrewsbury House
West Greenwich House
Charlton Assembly Rooms
Well Hall Pleasance – moat, bridge etc.
Tudor Barn
Severndroog Castle
Charlton Park walls
The Tarn ice well
Charlton cemetery drinking fountain
Andrew Gibb Memorial shelter
Rachel McMillan nursery
Woolwich Polytechnic School, Sandy Hill Road
Woodhill
Eltham Hill School, bothy and boundary wall
Wybourne School, Footscray Road
Deansfield School, Glenesk Road
Gordon School, Grangehill Road
Maze Hill School, Royal Hill
Plumstead Manor School, Old Mill Road
James Wolfe School, Randall Place
Crown Woods School
Greenslade School, The Slade
East Greenwich Library
West Greenwich Library
Woolwich Library
Eltham Library
Plumstead Library
Borough Hall
Rothbury Hall
Coronet Cinema, Well Hall road
Entrance to both foot tunnels
Conduit Head, Southend Crescent
Callis Yard
Greenwich Theatre, Nevada Street wall.
From Peter Mumford
I was very interested to see from your website (which I have only just discovered) that someone from English Heritage recently gave a talk on the Mumford mill. My name is Peter J.G. Mumford and the mill was owned by my family. I was taken around the mill just before my family sold it in the early sixties when it was an empty shell having been stripped of its contents by Rank Hovis when their lease ended. I have many old photographs  of the mill and indeed some original plans (I think). I will have to dig. I lived in London for many years and often used to pass the mill but I haven’t seen it for about fifteen years. I would be very interested in knowing what info you have about the mill, and indeed if you could advise me of the current ownership. I long to see inside it again and would very much like to show my sons what their grand parents and great grandparents and great great grand parents achieved.

From David Riddle
A public meeting at the Greenwich Borough Halls was informed by Transport for London last night that 'with a fair wind' the works to repair Blackheath Hill would take a further four months. There is apparently no evidence whatever of actual 'caverns' beneath the road or it's surroundings. What appears to have happened is that various chalk workings have occurred on either side of the
carriageway over the past 400 years, as well as in the vicinity of the old, and reasonably well documented, Jack Cade Cavern off Maidenstone Hill. These, generally, did not pass under the 'King's Highway' which was, even 400 years ago, deemed 'illegal'. One passage has been positively identified that appears to link the workings on either side of the road. These working have been filled with a loose mixture of chalk Thanet Sand (the other main geological material in the area.  There is no clay).
This material has then come under any one or more of five influences;
1. Natural settlement of the fill from its own weight. Obviously occurs. but not of a 'catastrophic nature' in itself.
2. Vibration from heavy vehicles. Deliberate 'vibratory rolling' to compact new road surfaces is limited in effect to 300-500mm, so this is considered to be relatively unlikely as a main cause.
3 Vibration from construction works. No works in progress at the time. '
4. Natural rainfall water. This caused leaching of the sand component and slippage of the fill down the chalk spine's slope. Regular.. and a likely significant contributory cause.
5. Sudden flushes of water from burst water mains (another was hit by the workmen at 1pm yesterday and was still running as the meeting concluded at 8pm!) and flash floods. Highly likely main contributor to the incident.
It is considered that 4 and 5 are the most likely causes of the incident, but the real cause "will never be known".
After extensive surveys, the final results of which are still not through, last week 'grouting' work began to inject a 'mortar' mix under pressure into the previous mining in-fill that lies on either side of a chalk 'spine' that lies beneath the centre of the carriageway.. i.e. the original Roman Road. This 'fill' varies in thickness from just a metre or so at the top to thirty metres further out. The mortar will bind the sand and chalk so that the sand is less likely to leach.
The current test grouting is taking place in the area of carriageway above the one known tunnel. Once permissions have been granted, works will then move to an area of pavement outside Glennie House where both vertical and diagonal bores under the property will be made to inject grout. As long as no structural damage is evident from this work, the procedure will be carried out over a 300m section of the Hill on either side of the carriageway. An exhibition of photographs and diagrams of the old caves, the survey works and the plans for remedial action was held in the week following the meeting. A great deal of additional information was provided and many questions were dealt with.
I have printed copies of the PowerPoint slides if anyone is interested.

From Ray McBrindle

With forebears involved in the Arsenal and living in the district since at least the middle 1800s, I have been able to make good use of the excellent on-line Greenwich Industrial History materials on the net. I now have an enquiry about blind workers in Greenwich.
My mother's grandfather, Charles McClellend, lived in Roan Street in the 1870s and went to live in Maidenstone Hill after marrying in 1879. Charles was recorded as being blind in the 1881 census. It took a bit of working out, but he appears to have been a ship fender maker. I have found  
A number of blind people in the Greenwich area in 1881, many of them involved in basket making and fender making. I have found the letter from Beryl Mason in GIH, March 2001 which suggest that there was a blind workshop in Greenwich, including the manufacture of
fenders and baskets. She mentions rope, which I had not thought of, so appears to nudge me along the track a bit more. But I would like to know of any information or sources of information that might lead to a better understanding of the likely place(s) that Charles might have worked at, and what fender making involved. Was Greenwich a particularly good place for blind workers to be? In the mid-1880s the family moved to Harvard Road, near Hither Green, and in 1886 Charles was described as a master basket maker there. He appeared to be reasonably well paid, because he supported a family of six girls.
Can you help please, or point me to someone who can? I would be very grateful.

From John E.McLean
Thank you for forwarding the copy of your last newsletter which included a brief history of my grandfather’s clay pipe making. This short article was the result of my wife’s association with Iris Bryce of many years standing.  I understand that Philip Wooland contacted you about the article and he has now been to see me.  I gave him grandfathers’ pipe mould and he was delighted.  I am so pleased to be of some help.
(We understand that Philip Wooland is planning on writing an article – which we will publish in due course – about the pipe making works of Mr.McLean’s grandfather).

From J.Martin
We are looking for any kind of information on the company Jessop  & Appleby Brothers. We’re doing research on an old yard crane called Titan that was built by them early in the last century, It was used to build the present Port of Las Palmas where we work.  We would appreciate any information you can give us.


William Luckett pipemaker

$
0
0
WILLIAM LUCKETT CLAY TOBACCO PIPE-MAKER OF PLUMSTEAD 1865-1948
Phillip Woollard

William Luckett was born in 1865 in Plumstead, son of George and Jane Luckett. In 1881 the family was living at 47 Princes Road Plumstead with their eight children; the youngest was Frederick aged 4 and the oldest George aged 19. Father George aged 45 was a ‘Helper in Forge. (Iron)’, while George junior was an ‘Engine Cleaner (F&L)’ William aged 16 was a Factory Hand. The other children were all at school1

The circumstances that changed William from being a factory hand to a pipe-maker are not entirely clear but it is significant that in 1881 at 31 Princes Road (became Herbert Place in 1939) was Henry Stubbs aged 34 ‘Tobacco Pipe-Maker’ living with his twice widowed mother Ellen Riddle2 and at number 13 Princes Road was his brother, Thomas Jeptha Stubbs, Tobacco Pipe Manufacturer. Thomas had nine children three of whom were Tobacco Pipe Makers: Thomas, 20, Henry 15 and Walter 13.3

Since William was living in the same road and in such close proximity to the Stubbs family, it seems likely that young William Lucket would have known the family, particularly Henry and Walter and it may have been at this early date that he formed the idea of becoming a pipe maker, if not earlier. In 1898 William had moved to 67 Palmerston Road, a few streets away from Princes Road, (at this time he appears in the residential section of the London Directory but not in the trade section.) This part of Palmerston Road must have been built around 1897, as a map of 1894/6, showing the road, does not include his house. What however the map does show is that to the immediate east of Palmerston Road was a clay pit belonging to the large Brick and Tile works of Mr. Dawson. Dawson's house, 'The Links', is also shown to the North East of the clay pit. It is probable that at least one of the clay bowls mentioned by John Me Lean in his article, were made using clay from this site. It is not until 1937 that we have a map (originally published in 1907) showing William's house.67 Palmerston Crescent, (note change of name) with the subsequent development of the area Number 67 was built on a piece of rising land as the map of 1894/6 indicates.

According to William's grandson, John McLean, the kiln that William eventually built was on a piece of rising land which he may have made use of to produce a draught for his kiln. If he was making pipes at this time there is no indication of it in the 1901 census where he describes himself as a 'General Labourer'.4  However lodging with William and his daughter Mabel at 67 Palmerston Road, was a 60 year old ‘Boarder’ -"John Longworth, ‘Tobacco Pipemaker of London’ and to make matters more interesting is the fact that lodging and working for Henry Stubbs (son of Thomas Stubbs) at 23 Princes Road was William Andrews 62 Pipemaker (born Paddington c. 1863)5 Both John Longworth and William Andrew's would have known each other as in 1861 they had both been in the employ of John Harrison Pipemaker Muswell Hill Road, Highgate. Furthermore they were both members of the London Journeymen Tobacco Pipe Makers Trade Protection Society.6   

There can be little doubt that John Longworth was helping William Luckett in the pipe making business while William was content to describe himself as a ‘General Labourer' In 1906 he makes his first appearance in the trade section of the London Directory as: William Luckett Tobacco Pipe Manufacturer 67 Palmerston Road Plumstead. Of interest is the fact that William, according to John McLean, was a member of the Ancient Order of Foresters though no pipes bearing their crest or insignia can be attributed to William.

Of the pipes themselves several examples are known to exist. Three are in the collection of Mr. Peter Hammond which were illustrated in the newsletter of the Society for Clay Pipe Research (SCPR)7.One in the collection of Roy Mitchell recorded in the newsletter of the SCPR. (Not illustrated).8  Two in the Greenwich Museum one of which, the Derry Castle type is made from a black clay.9 The other is a complete plain pipe with the name LUCKETT incised on the left hand side and PLUMSTEAD on the right. The pipe mould mentioned by Mr. John McLean, is of another design; this was made for the Christmas market. It carries the message. HAPPY CHRISTMAS & A HAPPY NEW YEAR. The mould - generously given to the writer by Mr. John McLean will be donated to the Broseley Pipe Museum Shropshire where Mr. Rex Key will make pipes from it and exhibit them and the mould in the museum.  

Of William Luckett's family life, we have the following facts. His wife was Mary Jane Day (known affectionately as Jinny) of Duxford a hamlet near to Hinton Waldrist Berkshire. (now Oxfordshire). A watercolour of the cottage where Mary Jane Day lived was painted by the present day John McLean and remains in his possession. They had two children, Mabel and Harold. Harold became an engineer. Mabel married John Mclean Snr. about 1924. The Register of Electors has recorded them living at 67 Palmerston Road in 1925 but their names were subsequently deleted, indicating that they had left by this time. They were the parents of John McLean whose reminiscences began this search. William's name occurs in the Register of Electors until 1948/9 but is not there in 1949/50 so we may presume he died in 1948. 

William Luckett would appear to have been a singular man who, from the recollections of his grandson, was proud, intelligent and strong minded, not to be trifled with. He followed a trade that was very demanding and not well paid, so one may conclude that his was primarily a labour of love To add to his problems was the fact that by the late nineteenth century the clay tobacco pipe was going out of fashion so it is a testament to his character that he was able to support himself and a family on the pipemaking trade.



References.
1.RG II/075 lf.89 p.23., 2..RG 11/0751. f87  p.20, 3..RG 11/0751 f.86 p.l7, 4.RG 13/575 f.93 p.47. , 5.RG 13/571 f.llO p.37, 6. Peter Hammond. private communication., 7. SCPR. Newsletter 1998. No.54. p.62., 8. SCPR. Newsletter 1997. No.52. p.56,  9. Greenwich Museum Acc. No. 1969. 271.
My thanks.to John McLean for allowing me to visit his home and treating me as though he had known me all his life.  To Peter Hammond, that never failing source of information.many thanks for all the details on John Longworth and the Stubbs family, and for permission to use the illustrations of Luckett pipes from his collection.

Reviews and snippets November 2002

$
0
0

Reviews and snippets November 2002


LEWISHAM HISTORY JOURNAL – No.10 2002 has just been published by Lewisham Local History Society and contains articles on Dolly Sedgewick and on the Cold Blow Farm area of Deptford.  Both of these are outside of the Greenwich area – but who could resist the article about Dolly who was a ‘lady parachutist ‘ in the early 1900s.  Dolly went on to marry the Lewisham District Surveyor but kept in touch with her past by flying with the Red Arrows in her 90s

CROSSNESS ENGINES RECORD - Vol.8 No.2. Autumn 2002 – keeps up its usual sanitary standard. Articles on ‘The Cinder Path’, ‘Toilets in China’, Notes from the Octagon (see some of this elsewhere), New Boilers needed, Book reviews,  etc etc

BLACKHEATH GUIDE. - The September 2002 edition carried an excellent article by Peter Kent in his ‘Riverwatch’ series – this was called ‘Coming up with the goods’.  Peter talks here about the aggregate trade in Greenwich and how it has helped the construction of Canary Wharf and much else in Docklands ‘had these tonnages been transported by road it would have created in excess of 176,000 lorry movements’. He also notes how prefabricated windows and doors – and indeed the sections of the London Eye and Millennium Bridge have been transported to their sites by water.

GREENWICH TIME - noted the opening of the new ‘Ha-penny Hatch bridge’ across Deptford Creek. The original was built as part of the original Greenwich Railway and demolished in the 1930s.
There has also been a mention of the visit to Woolwich of the replica of Captain Cook’s ship ‘Endeavour’ built for the TV series. Endeavour was open to the public for some days at the new Woolwich Pier in the Arsenal.

GLIAS NEWSLETTER -Among a whole range of things of interest to industrial historians is a write up the Greenwich Foot Tunnel 100 year anniversary celebrations.

JOURNAL OF THE GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY -This includes a number of articles which are heavily ‘dirt’ archaeology as well as others – ‘Archaeological work in Greenwich 1997-2001’ by Julian Bowsher, ‘Moving status and Maritime Greenwich’ by Joanna Smith, The Knill family of Blackheath by Michael Egan, and an Archaeological Investigation at the Cutty Sark station development by Alistair Douglas. We are also pleased to see a review of Julie Tadman’s book ‘A fisherman of Greenwich’ by Barbara Ludlow.

MERIDIAN - The August 2002 edition of Meridian contained a detailed article about the building of the Greenwich Foot Tunnel as a tribute to its hundredth anniversary.

SLAS NEWS.- The 91st Newsletter of the Southwark and Lambeth Archaeological Society contains an article on the TV based Time Team’s excavations in Greenwich Park by our member Richard Buchanan.

INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE -The Summer 2002 Vol.28 edition contains several articles of interest to Greenwich readers – albeit they are all things which have either appeared in our newsletter or written by our members: John MacLean’s Clay Pipe Making in Plumstead (you saw it here first – see the sequel in this issue).  Peter Jenkins on Webster and Horsfall (held back by us for lack of space – you will see it eventually), Mary Mills on John Beale of Greenwich.

GREATER LONDON ARCHAEOLOGY ADVISORY SERVICE – Quarterly Review -Includes under ‘Greenwich’ reports on archaeological work at the National Maritime Museum along with Channel 4’s Time Team. Also at Anchor Iron Wharf where Tudor brick walls are probably those of the Hobby Stables, and as East Wing (Building 14) of the Royal Arsenal – showing a strengthened floor used to store ship supplies.
Reports have been received on a number of Greenwich sites - **National Maritime Museum – Tudor walls from the tiltyard and mooring chains from training ship Fame - ** Old Royal Naval College - site trenches used as 18th landfill dumps, internal cess pit, 18thgraffiti, and some Roman remains.

GREENWICH AND WOOLWICH AT WORK  by Mary Mills. Sutton Publishing, £12.99 IBSN 0-7509-3000-4.
There have been other publications produced detailing the life of Greenwich and Woolwich in pictures but Mary Mills in her book Greenwich and Woolwich at Work has captured in her unique style an aspect not covered before.
At £12.99 this hard cover of 127 pages of high quality produced photographs, accompanied by informative captions is excellent value. For those born in the two districts the book will bring back memories of their early years, of long lost industries, factories, roads and pubs, which were part of the everyday life of their parents, relatives and friends. To those who are relatively new to the area, the pictures will reveal a new and possibly unexpected aspect to what made the people of Greenwich and Woolwich tick.  To researchers and students ‘Greenwich and Woolwich at Work’ should provoke them into further research to discover and explore how the industries mentioned and those many others not covered influenced the lives of the inhabitants in the area.
Review by Ron Roffey

BROOK HOSPITAL WOOLWICH WATER

By Jack Vaughan

In Newsletter July Vol. 5 No.3. p.8 I submitted a piece on the above outlining the possibility of rescuing some relevant hydraulic arrangements attached to the base of the former hospital water tower, shortly to be converted into accommodation.
Ownership of the site which includes the tower has now changed hands and we are taking up the rescue question with the newly appointed builders responsible for the Tower building works.
Crossness Engines Trust have shown an interest in housing the hydraulic items in their collection
We hope shortly to visit the site to discuss any problems of disconnection and transport.


CROSSNESS ENGINES – NEWS AND NOTES FROM THE OCTAGON

Prince Consort Engine - Following the lagging and the cladding  of pipework, gauges needed to be installed to monitor the control of the engine at work. Meanwhile work on the new cooling pond is progressing -this is being constructed in a former bunded area which lay beneath two enormous diesel storage tanks, which were removed from the site two years ago. The pond has been waterproofed and wooden weirs are being installed to separate out leaves and oil from water on its way back to the condenser.

The Valve House
The site for the Easton and Anderson Engine has almost been decided subject to some final measurements.

Beam Engine House.
Work continues on the windows and soon we will be able to remove stored materials and find room for parts  removed from the Victoria Engine.

Visitor Centre
A cabinet (inherited from Hall Place, Bexley) has displays of the tools made on site. Labelling of the photographic display is almost finished and then  lighting will need to be renewed.. We have started to improve the main hall and a bust of Sir Joseph Bazalgette has been splendidly displayed in a 'classical' cabinet set on the wall at the far end and   painted by our 'resident artist' to depict London in the 19th century.

The Terrace Garden..
Circular flower beds are being restocked with fresh flowers ready for the spring. We are intending to replace all the missing 'rope' style border edging and would like to know of a source of this (please contact if you can help).
Aquisitions

Appleby Single-Cylinder Horizontal Steam engine from a Vinegar Works in Southwark has been donated.  This  was once used to drive line-shafting in Sarson's Works. It was stored at the old Streatham bus garage and two reconnaissance sorties were made to plan its  disassembly. On Monday  23rdSept. a group went to tackle the job which took about five hours, and on the Wednesday a 'H1AB' crane lorry picked up the engine and brought it to Crossness. The lorry had previously been to Kew Bridge Engine Museum and picked up two Watson pumps, originally from the Houses of Parliament where they had been used in the air-circulation system. These will eventually be on display in The Valve House.
2. A Sirex WC pan (c. 1900) is  being extracted from  the  19th century Bexleyheath Adult Education College building. It should soon be on display in the Visitor Centre.

Lady visitors will be pleased to know that the LADIES facility in the small building outside the Beam Engine House has been fitted with new toilet pans and sinks and awaits redecoration.

Adapted from  The Crossness Engines Record, Vol.. 8 No.2. Autumn 2002 without permission.


KIDBROOKE SCHOOL   
ARTICLE FROM THE FESTIVAL OF BRITAIN SOCIETY WEBSITE.

Notes in 'Festival Times' that the original beams of the Dome of Discovery were hidden away in a Greenwich School sent me scurrying off to find out – was it true?  A look through the local papers for Greenwich in 1951-3 made me pretty sure it wasn't true because there was no coverage of the story at all but there was something else.  – there were stories of the enormous new school started in Kidbrooke in April 1951.  Although its enormous hall was actually planned before the Festival of Britain and before the Festival Hall, it has been compared with them in both style and scale – and it is easy to understand how the story of the beams began.

I am not really sure if the school is really anything to do with the Festival but I am writing to tell Festival Times about it because, apart from the story of the beams, it really has something to say to us about the early 1950s.  The school was the first purpose built comprehensive school, originally for girls only.  It was on a scale not seen before – for 2,000 girls and with huge range of special features (eg: 5 gymnasia!).  They hold huge scrapbooks of their press coverage over the years – and it is fascinating to read the hostile stories in the press when the school opened in 1954 and the constant barrage of critical stories in the tabloid press of the day.  Nevertheless it has survived and along with the educational ideas which marked it out, it is rapidly being realised that it is a treasure of early 1950s architecture. The present management is doing the best it can to see that original features are preserved and, in some cases restored.

The school scrapbooks also contain articles from the technical press, which detail the construction methods and materials in a great deal of detail.  The copper domed school hall today stands out above the surrounding suburban housing – inside it is, understandably, a bit worn,  but the integrity of the underlying design shines through.  The dome is, however, not really like the Dome of Discovery.  If anyone would like details I am happy to send references or a photocopy.  A series of articles was written about the roof by B.K.Chatterjee, who was one of the engineers involved – who was he, and what happened to him? Work by an Asian engineer on such a major building must have been very unusual at the time.  The architects of the building were Slater, Uren and Pike and the consulting engineers were Ove Arup.

MUSEUM IN DOCKLANDS FAILS TO OPEN

The long-awaited Museum in Docklands failed to open this summer after a mysterious benefactor failed to keep a promise to underwrite running costs. As a result it has been forced by its main fonder, the Heritage Lottery Fund, to hold merger talks with the Museum of London.

The museum, which chronicles the 2,000-year history of the Port of London received an initial £11.5m grant from the HLF five years ago. Construction costs ran £1,7m over budget, and so far a total of£16m has been spent. Grants of around £4m from the former Docklands Development Corporation and corporate donors were quickly swallowed up.

The museum's site, a Napoleonic era warehouse close to Canary Wharf dating back to 1802, it is itself a piece of Docklands history. It has been refurbished to house artefacts, paintings, models, boats and machinery that tell the story of London's port from Roman times to the present day. The exhibits are all in place, including numerous archaeological finds from Roman and Saxon times. The galleries are almost ready to be opened, and a fun area for children is nearing completion. The centre also includes a lecture and film theatre.
Copied from GLIAS NEWSLETTER  202, October 2002 without permission.


Letters November 2002

$
0
0
Letters November 2002


FIRST OF ALL - A COMPLAINT AND AN APOLOGY
From Myles Dove
Yesterday I had to collect my copy of the Greenwich Industrial History Society news letter from the Blackheath Sorting Office; they could not deliver it because there was no stamp on it and I was left a card stating that there would
be a charge of 99p when I came to collect it, made up of the 2nd class stamp value 19p and a handling charge of 80p, total 99p.
It was annoying to have to collect it and pay a charge in this way but my feelings of irritation increased when I started to read my article about the Greenwich Foot Tunnel Centenary and found that there were many mistakes, several serious ones, in transferring text from my original  - which was typed not handwritten and so this should not have happened.  For example:
Page 3    
As printed in GIHS newsletter   
Overcame                          
LGC                                  
55 ft below low water
Currently they are 7 am - 1 on Sunday Monday - Saturday and 10 am - 5.50 pm in the Greenwich foot tunnel (different times apply in the Woolwich foot tunnel-1)
As typed in original
              Overcome
              LCC
              33 ft below low water
Currently they are 7 am -7 pm Monday - Saturday and 10 am - 5.30 pm on Sunday (different times apply in the Woolwich foot tunnel).
Page 4
As printed in GIHS newsletter
Grade I
As typed in the original
              Grade II (actually typed Grade 2)
When the GIHS Newsletter has to be produced in this way with no time allowed for proof- reading and checking copy it seems to me that contributors are not being treated properly.  I feel let down because people who know me will be puzzled to see that obvious mistakes like the wrong statutory grading have been left uncorrected, and people who don’t know me will think I've failed the basic task of checking facts. Please could you ensure that immediate corrections are made on the GIHS Newsletter web site so that people with this facility will have a corrected version.  It may be some time before the next issue of the Newsletter but I shall be disappointed if it doesn’t include a note of these points.

APOLOGIES AND EXCUSES
  1. We refunded Myles’ money in full. If anyone else has an unstamped envelope please ring 0208 858 9482 and we will refund your money.
  2. We cannot continue to send out this newsletter entirely based on the pressed labour of one spouse. Please can someone volunteer to help ensure that the newsletter is sent out in properly addressed envelopes with the right stamps on them.
  3. Sorry – time constraints mean that typed articles have to be scanned not re-typed and the scanner does sometimes get things wrong - so
  4. We need another volunteer to proof read. It is not fair on the pressed spouse who has to do all of it. Things need to be read word for word against the original – and to be done reasonably quickly (say within 36 hours).
  5. Contributors need to either provide material on disc. If it is not, and it needs to be scanned, they will need to make it clear if they want to proof read it themselves and be clear that it could mean a two month delay before it is printed.
  6. All of Myles’ corrections went in before it went onto the web site.

THIS NEWSLETTER CAN ONLY CONTINUE TO BE PRODUCED WITH MORE HELP.



From Wesley Harry, Formerly Technical Information Officer, MQAD and recently, Historian, Royal Arsenal. M Q A D at The Royal Arsenal
I feel I must dispel the impression that may have been given by Bruce Blissett's excellent article, that the Department was solely concerned with materials at The Royal Arsenal. It was responsible for Outstations scattered throughout the country, Woolwich being its administrative centre, albeit with its own "Outstation".
At the peak of the Second World War, the total number of staff was 1633, of whom more than half were females, and there were sixty six outstations, ranging in size from 4-man laboratories, to composite outstations employing 90 chemists and assistants. In addition there were numerous substations employing 2 or 3 assistants at detached laboratories on contractors' works, these being controlled from the nearest main outstation. Mention must also be made of two chemists who were posted to North America in September 1940, (one to Canada, the other to U.S.A.) to act as liaison officers in connection with the inspection of supplies of explosives and chemicals for shipment to Britain. In 1937 an inspection station was opened in the Bofors factory, Sweden, to cover a contract for anti-aircraft weapons and ammunition. All these outstations were ultimately responsible to the Head of Department, Woolwich.
When the department ultimately closed, there were still outstations at such places as Swynnerton, Bridgwater, Bishopton and Chorley.

From Ron Roffey
Re: Mary Mills book ‘Greenwich and Woolwich at Work’.  We read through and looked at the pictures with great nostalgia.  We were both born in Charlton. My family had several hundred years of service in Siemens. My grandmother was a Garratt of barge breaking fame – my mother worked in James’ shirt factory in Wood Hill and my uncle was a tool maker at Harveys. Joan’s father was a propeller slinger at J.Stone & Co. – her mother worked at Johnson & Phillips and Joan herself worked in the Arsenal.  I played soccer for the minors of J. Stone and cricket at British Ropes.  So you can see why were so fascinated.

From Andrew Gambier
I would like to put together a brief history of Annandale and Calvert Roads – to hopefully demonstrate how this area hasn’t changed for 100 years. Can anyone help?

From L.E.Baldock
Could you please tell me how to find out how the Cutty Sark came to be in its current position – how it was manoeuvred, etc. into that particular space, and the relevant dates.

From Derek Barlow
I was interested to read about the blue plaque on 145 Charlton Road to William H Barlow engineers. We are researching our Barlow family and have had no luck in locating William Barlow’s first wife .We know that there were two sons from that union one unknown the other called Crawford also little is known about him except we believe they were in engineering.  If you have any details on this son or Crawford that you would be willing to share with us we would be very grateful.  Is it possible to have a copy of the inscription on the plaque? 

From Graham Manchester
My Great Grandfather’s company used to be based at Dacre Park in Lee Green. He was the largest importer of working horses in the South East. When trucks came to pass he moved to Anchor and Hope Lane on the site now occupied by Makro and worked for Metropolitan Tar now the Millennium site. After the death of my Grandfather in 1966 the company opened up in Ordnance Wharf and Bay Wharf. The company has at this time 120 plus trucks. In 1976 we moved to the Millennium site to be told we had to be off site in 1999 to make way for the celebrations and buildings (What happened to the ballot for Birmingham and Manchester who knows but in 1976 they knew it was going to be in Greenwich!) The summer of 1976 was the hottest on record and we fought off mutant ladybirds 1" in diameter. The site was so contaminated I had to leave the it due to skin problems. During the excavations I reported this information to a journalist on Private Eye, next thing we knew tons and tons of the contaminated soil was being taken to Aylesbury. They were none too pleased. The site in Anchor and Hope Lane was shared by Hilton Transport and used for the filming of "The Brothers" T.V series. I can always remember the cast walking up Anchor & Hope Lane during filming. As an 18 year old (1972) Gabrielle Drake and Kate O'Mara made a large impression on me!

From John Greig
I have just seen that you have put my query in your newsletter. Many thanks, however, there is one problem, in several instances my name is mispelt as GRIEG rather than GREIG, most importantly in the e-mail address.

From Kay Bigsby
I wonder if you can help me. I recently obtained a birth cert of one of my relatives. On it it states that he was an engine driver in Building works. He lived in Plumstead. Do you know of any Building works that would have been near there that would have been large enough to have engine drivers? The year is 1900. I do hope you can help.

From Melanie Boxall
I read with interest Pat O'Driscoll's piece about the Norton's Barge Builders. Richard Norton ("Dick") was my great-grandfather. Richard Norton senior began the barge company. His eldest son who inherited the business was the Dick Norton that Pat talks about in her article. My grandfather, George Lees Norton, Dick's younger brother, started as an apprentice at the family business, but after just three years he quit and went his own way. Dick's sister Mary had a son, David Bradley, who is now a schoolteacher in the Greenwich area.

From Pete Stobart

The article 'Taken For a Ride' concludes with the statement that the location of the tram graveyard in Charlton is not known. I used to work for Siemens in the days when trams were being taken apart, and was able to easily view the dismantling proceedings as the plot was directly west of the Siemens site, only separated by the service road running down toward the Thames. Assuming there is knowledge of where Siemens was then the tram graveyard site can be easily determined. It utilized the entire block of ground there.

From Dan Byrnes

Is there any chance if you could tell me if anyone lately has done any genealogy (not industrial) research on whaler Daniel Bennett (died 1826) of Blackheath? He had an unknown father but a brother William who was a cooper, I can't seem to find anything on them on the Net for some new writing I'm engaging in. 

Glenn Rigden - Deputy Chairman- Institution of Engineers Australia Heritage Committee
I am trying to obtain some information on the Appleby Brothers Co. who supplied four compound beam engine-pumping stations to the NSW Public Works - Harbours & Rivers Branch back in 1880 - 1883. I would greatly appreciate if there was any information on the actual order and supply of the engines.  We have a complete operating beam engine still intact with the original pump house and boilers in Goulburn NSW which was one of the four. The remaining has been demolished. The site is on the Australian national estate listing and as an industrial society we are aiming to plaque this significant site.  Can you assist in supplying any information or in giving me any leads?

Rod Groombridge Townsville & Districts Subsection Naval Association of Australia
I am presently doing some research for the Maritime Museum here in Townsville on a 5" Naval Gun that is at the Museum. The only history we have on it is that it was possibly one of the four that was sent out and two were to be placed on HMQS Paluma and what happened after that is another search. What we are after is the history of this gun and we would appreciate any information that we can gain. The information of the origin of the gun is as follows 5" B.L. Gun 5" V.C.P. Mk1 Made by R. L. Carriage Dept 1887 Exd at R.C.D. Woolwich 1887 t Carriage 12cwt Reg. No. K778 If you have any info on who ordered them, cost etc or anything it would be greatly appreciated.

From Paul

My grandmother was born at Anchor and Hope Alley No 22. Her family, the Hampshires, were bakers and also Lightermen on the Thames Barges. Can you advise me whether Anchor and Hope Alley was an Alley off of Anchor and Hope Lane.

From Kathy Lawson

Where can I find information about a Robert Lockhart/Lockhead Lawson, who was a House Surgeon at Greenwich Naval Hospital?  – on one of the Hospital ships, which were moored there. He was a local GP living at St Mary’s Barry Road Camberwell, at the time of the 1881 Census. His wife Harriet nee Poland, daughter of a Lewisham Fur Trader. Robert died in 1898 .

From David Riddle
Did you see this?  In the News Shopper? Probably just Jack Cade Cavern though? ”Mystery of the hole explained?  I write regarding the caves at Blackheath Hill. I lived and worked in the Deptford and Greenwich area for over 60 years.  Copies of News Shopper are sent to me every month and, I noted with interest, the large hole that appeared on Blackheath Hill.  As a teenager I often explored underground caves in this area.  Several times we entered the workings through a small covered shaft, which was situated at the rear of a service garage, in Hyde Vale, some 150 yards from Blackheath Hill.  When we walked through from the bottom of the shaft we came to a large cavern, about 18-ft high, situated under the hill. Other narrow passages led off in the direction of the heath and we were told at the time these led out towards Chislehurst Caves. I trust this information will be of interest.

From David Asprey

Cubow Shipbuilders Can you help us? We are trying to trace photographs of ships. We carried out the electrical design and installation at Cubow Shipbuilders. The ships we are interested in were built between 1972 and 1982. I believe in 1972 the Yard was called Fairmile Marine but I may be wrong. I do not know the ships’ names but I do have a list of Yard numbers. Will you be able to help or point me in the right direction?

From: Len Chapman
The Tunnel narrows significantly as you approach the lift on the Tower Hamlet’s side. The construction also changes and appears to be exposed cast iron rings bolted together. On one of our many trips through the tunnel, my wife asked the Lift Operator the reason for this. He said during the last war, two bombs had landed in close vicinity to that tunnel entrance and caused cracking. The cast iron rings were, in fact, a repair to the tunnel to overcome this damage. I wonder if anyone can confirm this.

From Jill Murphy

I have a relative Joseph Cleverley who was listed as a "dock policeman" in the 1881 UK census. He was the younger brother of my great great grandfather Charles Cleverley and they appear to have been the only two surviving sons. Where would I find more on Joseph Cleverley?

From Chris Mazeika

I am sending you some information about Deptford Dockyard (Convoy’s Wharf). Outline planning permission is being sought. Proposals include 3,400 car-parking spaces, 3,600 homes, three towers up to 40 storeys, industrial and commercial premises including a propsal by mayoral candidate, Nicky Gavron, to erect a waste transfer station on the site of Henry VIII’s Great Storehouse of 1513.  Please contact me. 


From Peter Wood
I do hope the following may be of interest to you and your readers.
The bronze Memorial Plaque was, as many people reading this will know, presented to the next of kin of those who died in the Great War of 1914-18. I have been doing some research into the subject for the last few years, based on the earlier work of Philip Dutton at the Imperial War Museum. My research has uncovered a fair amount of intrigue, and myths, with regard to the production of these medallions - often referred to as the 'Death Plaque,' and 'Dead Man's Penny.' Production of the memorial plaque was first carried out in Acton. But from June 1922 to 1930 (and maybe later), the brass foundry section at Woolwich Arsenal carried out the work - and made approximately 700,000 plaques distributed to all countries of the British Empire. All the plaques made at the Arsenal are stamped WA on the rear of the plaque. I would be very interested to hear from anyone who has knowledge, and photos, of  events at Woolwich with relation to the production of these plaques. Each plaque is around 4.5 inches in diameter, weighs around 4 ounces, and the name of the deceased was cast (or sometimes engraved); no rank was ever mentioned, with the idea being that everyone was equal in death.
A scroll accompanied each plaque which did include a person's rank - and the regiment/service in which the deceased had served. 

From Michael Cooke
Earlier in the year I visited Greenwich because I am doing some research into the early days of the electric telegraph (and submarine cables). My interest centres on Owen Rowland (1820-1877) and his contribution to its development.
My research has revealed his involvement in electric telegraphy from 1848 when he assisted Sir William Fothergill Cooke. Around 1860 he was engaged as Electrician to the Joint Committee set up by the Government to look into the construction of Submarine Telegraphs, following the failure of the first attempts at laying a transatlantic cable. Several of the Appendices in the resulting Report contain results of investigations carried out by him. These were mainly concerned with testing of the insulation of submarine cables, mainly of test pieces but also of the cables being manufactured.
I visited Greenwich to see what has survived of the site of the old cable works of Glass Elliot as almost certainly Rowland would have been in close contact with the company during the time leading up the successful cable being laid by the Great Eastern. I was very pleased to find the ‘visitors area’ at Enderby’s Wharf with its information display board. I found it most interesting.
I am wondering whether any other relics of cable making 150 years ago have survived at this site: eg. The old tanks used for storing the cables? Have any of the old company records survived, and are they available somewhere for researchers to consult.
Is there any publication that goes into detail about the early days of cable making at Greenwich?  I also am wondering if you can point me in the direction of anyone who has made an in depth study of electric telegraph submarine cable making, testing and their deployment in the mid-19thcentury.

From David Kempton
I am performing a slow labour of love. That being the publishing on the web of "Wonders of World Engineering". I did a search on this recently and found that you had referred to it with regards to the Queen Mary anchors. ( I believe that you or the person who typed it may have meant to say "propellors".)
Anyway, if you felt my site worthy of a mention in your next edition of GIH I would be very grateful. Its only going to be through encouragement that I'll complete this task !!! I'm only up to issue 12 but if you mention it I'll put that article from 23 on as a "queue jump"

Mary Mills replied: Oh dear - yes, I did put anchors, didn't I? I think Wonders of World Engineering is terrific. My father worked at Fleetway, Gravesend where many of these Harmsworth part works were printed and I always had the pictures to play with as a child. We had copies of all of them but I have no idea what happened to them, since they had all disappeared by the time my parents died.

From Pat O’Driscoll
I have been reading Mary Mills’ new book ‘Greenwich and Woolwich at Work’ – perhaps I can make some comments on the picture on page 22 of the mast holding up the foreshore at Piper’s Wharf – the Lucy Richmond was Piper’s ‘roads’ barge – moored off the yard out in the river.  She was apparently put ashore at the yard about 1940 so that men could try to locate some leaks which had developed. One night she broke her ropes and launched herself, and was found downstream by a waterman. She was then broken up. Her mast was used to reinforce the river bank outside Piper’s for many years. It was only a few years ago that it disappeared – it was towed away by the PLA after it came adrift and local children were playing with it.

Kings Yard Deptford, listing proposals

$
0
0

Proposal to list features of King's Yard, Deptford (1513) –  by Chris Mazeika

Following the proposed development plan for the site of the former King's Yard at Deptford by the Richard Rogers Partnership on behalf of News International, it is desired to put into effect a listing proposal for those architectural and archaeological elements which significantly testify to the history of Royal Naval shipbuilding on the Upper Thames from 1513 to 1869.

Deptford Dockyard was the Cape Canaveral of its day, leading the technology of shipbuilding. The position of Master Shipwright at Deptford was the highest ranking of the yards.1 Deptford is renowned for the laying up of the Golden Hind, putting out ships for the Armada, including the first Ark Royal {Ark Ralegh} as well as ships for Nelson's campaigns. Fitting out Cook's Endeavour and Discovery, and being the favoured yard for constructing the Royal Yachts are a few of its accolades. A commonly held misapprehension is that little survives to commemorate the five hundred years of history. This document intends to correct that perception and calls for a reconsideration of how best to rectify the persistent neglect of the inherent values of this site by bringing into focus the architectural fabric.la

Initially attention is drawn to the Wharf wall. This element contains many features worthy of consideration. From Upper Watergate, the first significant feature is the entrance to the Double Dry Dock, which is fashioned from massive granite blocks. The dock gates are also believed to be in situ following recent archaeological test sites by English Heritage. A few feet beyond the dock mouth is another granite lining, which is the opening for the Landing Place and Lookout, which was open at least until the 1930's2and possibly the 1950's.It has been filled in with what look like flettons, and the stone coping of a lighter colour than that around it, suggesting it was reversed at the same time. 

This Landing Place is the most likely location for access during Royal visits, as evidenced by the paintings of John Clevely.3Several visits by Elizabeth 1, most notably on the 4th April 1581,for the knighting of Francis Drake aboard the Golden Hind, would have occurred within the immediate vicinity. The reinstatement of these steps would also correct a current historical inaccuracy that Sir Francis Drake ascended steps that were part of the Victualling Yard {1742} and are clearly masonry of the late eighteenth century. The foreshore forward of the Landing Place is paved in stone perpendicular to the steps as can be seen in A Plan of Part of the River Thames. Shewing the Harbour Moorings at Deptford, 1774.4

Some timbers from slipways also remain in situ on the foreshore, where repairs and infill to the wall no longer testify to their position. One of the most significant features is the mouth to the Basin. The basin of the Dockyard is mentioned in an Indenture from 1517, 5 where it states there floats the Mary Rose, the Great Galley, the Peter Pomegranite, the Great Bark and the Lesser Bark. The basin is also mentioned much earlier in the time of Edward I, in connection with fishing rights. 6

The extant opening is that designed by the eminent engineer Sir John Rennie,7 a reworking of an earlier proposal by Sir Samuel Bentham, 8who, amongst several other notable achievements had administered the Navy for Catherine the Great and Prince Potemkin 9 The Wharf walls both left and right which feature stone banding mid-way were constructed to Rennie's designs at the same time. 10  A short distance beyond the basin mouth the walls are constructed in raised panels of brick that is an unusual feature.

Finally the lock to the Mast Pond must be considered since it is the work of George Lewellyn-Taylor, 11 Navy Board architect following Edward Holl, and first president of the Architects and Antiquaries Society. Jonathan Coad, Inspector of Ancient Monuments & Historic Buildings for English Heritage in his book The Royal Dockyards 1690-1850 12 considers Taylor to be one of the finest dockyard architects.

One only has to look across the river to witness the bland monotony of steel sheeting characteristic of so much of the Thames.  the Wharf wall of Deptford Dockyard,  holding the key to a unique and unprecedented history in the Upper Thames, does not deserve the same fate. The sub-structures of the yard proper, the docks, slips, basins, landing places and stairs, constitute a substantial architectural fabric that is currently extant, though largely invisible, being covered by superficial accretion, or infill.12a

The double dry building dock was host to the workings of Henry VIII's master shipwright James Baker and his son Matthew Baker, who became one of the most important Elizabethan shipwrights. The dock was in early use since it is recorded that in  1517 the Great Nicholas was removed from Woolwich to the dock at Deptford at a cost of £14 3s. 5d.13 Among the most famous of the master shipwrights at Deptford were Peter Pert described in his epitaph as " the Noah of his age"14 one member of that illustrious dynasty of the seventeenth century and Jonas Shish father to another dynastic line, one of his pall-bearers being John Evelyn. The entry in Evelyn's diary 13th may 1680 reads, "I was at the funeral of old Mr Shish Master Shipwrite of the Kings yard here in this Parish, an honest and remarkable man, & his death a publique losse, for his excellent successe in building Ships, (though illiterate altogether) &for the breeding up so many of his children to be Artists: I held up the Pall with three knignts who did him that honour, & he was worthy of it:... T’was the costome of this good man, to rise in the night, and to pray kneeling in his owne cofin; which many yeares he had lying by him: he was borne that famous yeare of the Gunpowder Plot 1605."15 Documentation exists to testify to the unique history of this ancient structure. Though it has undergone alteration, this in itself holds the story of technological advancement in construction of ships. Its present design, believed to be by Inspector General Of Naval Works, Sir Samuel Bentham was carried out in his absence by John Rennie.16 It must be stated that not only is this one of the earliest features of the yard but it is also the first double dry dock to be built. It is monumental in scale and at some 370ft long, is unsurpassed as a structure to demonstrate the enormous historical significance of this site.

Though this is not the place to fully document the lamentable loss of the earliest naval building in the country to survive to the twentieth century, it being one of the earliest structures on the Thames, the destruction of the Tudor storehouse of 1513 in 1954.17  and the demolition of the remainder of the 1720's storehouse in 1984 18 with the removal of the cupola and clock to Thamesmead acts as a formidable reminder to the vigilance and determination needed to ensure such violations are not repeated.

The foundation stone with its royal cipher, A.X. {anno Christi} Henricus Rex 1513 and flame headed gothic arch entablature was described in 1953 by J.H.W.Haywood as "an extraordinary example of English brickwork of a beautiful design conceived with due regard and respect to the limitation of the medium employed and may eventually be regarded as the work of an artist craftsmen having very few equals."19 The whereabouts of this historic artefact and the four light mullioned window, both removed prior to demolition, has been established.20The Tudor undercroft of the Long Barn survives as do the several brick vaulted basements of the 1720's storehouse, with their segmental arches.21Following these recent discoveries it ought to be possible to go someway to put to rights the devastation wrought on this site up until such recent times.

Already listed Grade II, the covered slipways, another Bentham initiative,22 of 1846 by George Baker and Sons23 will remain. However, Roger's proposal fails to marry the Olympia Sheds to the basin and renders the basin a 3ft deep "water feature" in turn severed from the river. This is both intellectually lazy and historically offensive. 

In the early nineteenth century John Rennie was paid £4,500 to widen and deepen the basin.24  When so many docks and inland waterways have been lost, this most ancient and historically rich feature should be re instated to its last incarnation. 

In the scramble for redevelopment account must be taken of the inherent values of this site and care must be taken that the King's Yard at Deptford is not considered as just another brownfield site. The Greater London Authority has already declared its poverty of imagination, current proposals by mayoral candidate Nicky Gavron intend to erect a waste transfer station on the site of Henry VIII's storehouse. With more history than any other stretch of the Thames all efforts must be applied to recognize the group value of the extant features, bookended as they are by the listed buildings of the Royal Victoria Victualling Yard to the west and the listed Master Shipwright's House and John Penn's marine engineers to the east.

The recognition of this site of international significance is intended to resurrect its dormant values and vigorously enhance the sense of place. It takes its lead from the L.S.E's urban report commissioned by Lewisham Borough Council.25 The reinstatement of the elements detailed, whilst contributing to the restitution of meaning aims to promote a potent dialogue with history that carries us beyond the prevalent habit of street naming and erection of statues. The opportunity now exists to raise expectations of what can be delivered on this site considering the extent of development about to happen. The proposals concerning the historic fabric so far are merely cosmetic. They fail abundantly to honour the integrity of scale or resonate with  the vigour of the combined endeavours of exploration, world trade, adventure, empire and the requisite investment in engineering and technological invention. Courage and inspiration is drawn from the precedents set by the preservation of the site of building and launching Brunei's Great Eastern as well as Howland's Great Dock now Greenland Dock, and the remarkable achievements in the Chatham Yard.



1 British Library King's MS 44 d. 1774
la "by far the greater part of the dockyard survives as buried structures." Redevelopment of Convoy's Wharf, Deptford. Environmental Statement, Technical Annexes. Vol.1, p. 19 Archaeological Evaluation of Land at Convoy's Wharf, Deptford, David Divers Jan.2001.
2 Metropolitan Archive MBW2787 Thames Floods South
3 Private Collection H.M.S. Medway John Clevely 1753
4 BL King's MS 44
5 BL MS ADD. CH 6289
6 The Victorian History of the Counties of England, A History of Kent, Maritime History William Page FSA 1926
7 PRO Work 41/594 signed John Rennie
8 NMM ADM Q/ 3320-3323 9 Oct 1802, 23 Aug 1805
9 Potemkin and the Panoptican: Samuel Bentham and the Architecture of Absolutism in Eighteenth Century Russia. Simon Werret. The Bentham Newsletter 1998
10 PRO Work 41/594 see also NMM ADM Y/ D/l 1-D7 16 Nov 1813
11 NMM ADM Y / D / 11 -D8 1828
12 Jonathan Coad, Royal Dockyards 1690-1850 Scholar Press
12a ibid. David Divers. Jan.2001, p. 12 3.5.14. The slips, docks , basins and mastponds shown in the 1868 map were simply filled in intact between c.1869 and c.1955.
13 ibid. Page 1926
14 Leftwitch, The Parish and Church of St. Nicholas Deptford, Ecclesiological Society 1947
15 Guy de la Bedoyere Diary John Evelyn Boydell & Brewer 1995
16 PRO ADM1 /3501-3503 May 18 1815
17 PRO Work 14/1944 see also MA HLG 126/876, MA ACC/3499/EH/07 /01/447
18 MA ACC /3499/EH/02/148 [d. 1985]
19 MA ACC/3499/EH/07/01/447 [d.1950-1970]
20 Times, Register May 13 2002 Marcus Binney
21 MA ACC/3499/EH/09/01/01 [d.April 1977, April 1979]
22 Transactions of the Newcomen Society Vol.60.1988-89 Ship Building and the Long Span Roof, R. J.M.Sutherland p. 110
23 ibid. p. 117
24 PRO ADM 106/3185
25 L.S.E. Urban Planning Report, development of Convoy's Wharf, Deptford 2000
See also Hawkins. D. 2000 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment, Convoy's Wharf, Deptford, S.E.8. -unpublished report, CgMs. Ltd. Hawkins. D. 2000 Proposals for an Archaeological Evaluation Assessment: Convoy's Wharf, Deptford. S.E.8. - unpublished document CgMs. Ltd.
Copyright {C}2002, Chris Mazeika. This file may be copied on the condition that the entire contents and this copyright notice remain in tact


.


Arsenal buildings

$
0
0

BUILDINGS OF THE ARSENAL


PAPER CARTRIDGE FACTORY
Erected 1855-6 to designs by Lt Col R.S.Beatson, R.E. Has a 2-storey cast iron frame within brick walls. Some of the internal frame has been removed but most of it survives as a good example of robust mid-19th century iron construction. Converted to metal cartridge production circa 1884. By 1932 it was in use as an R.A.F. Bomb Shop. It has been extended to the rear and much altered, with most of the floor to the upper storey removed .
In 1852 the Board of Ordnance set up a committee to make the Royal Laboratory more efficient. It introduced steam power to the production of small arms on a large scale and
devised a process for the machine manufacture of small arms bag cartridges, probably originally destined for New Laboratory Square. This plan was disrupted by the outbreak of the Crimean War and it was decided instead to
erect a separate building, which was in use by 1857. Beatson had earlier been responsible for innovative use of structural iron at Portsmouth Dockyard: a two-tier cast iron water tower in 1843 and trussed cast iron floor beams in Boat House No. 6 in 1845-8. The Paper Cartridge Factory reflects some features of these buildings.
The contractors for the iron work are not known. Benjamin Hick & Son supplied the machinery and supplied iron elsewhere in the Arsenal at this period, as also did Henry Grissell [who had worked with Beatson at Portsmouth] and Fox & Henderson. The floor framing is of iron. No original flooring survives. It seems likely that this was of timber boarding, so the factory would not have been "fireproof", perhaps a low priority with a process requiring large volumes of water. The roof is in two 12.6m. spans, each framed in iron with elegant composite trusses.
Rags, the major raw material for paper making before 1860, would have been brought to the rag store in the separate north east block. These would have been cut and boiled, probably by women and children, either in the room over the rag store or at the east end of the main block. The main part of the ground floor of the main block was given over to large vats of water, possibly 10 or 15 in number. The rags would have been pulped by beating engines in the vats. The paper was made into cartridges by drying machines over the vats.
The west end of the ground floor to the north was given over to the engine house and, possibly, a water tank. The engine powered line shafting for all the building's machinery and perhaps also pumped water along pipes through the  central row of columns to the pulping vats.
From at least 1866 percussion caps, which had been made at Woolwich from 1841, were manufactured in the western bays to the south on the ground floor.

THE GRAND STORE [Buildings 36, 37, 46 & 49].
An imposing complex of two and three storey warehouses overlooking the Thames. Originally comprised three quadrangles of which the great central group survives largely in its original form. The north and south ranges of the West Quadrangle survive as part of Building 45 [q.v.} but the East Quadrangle was demolished in 1967.
It was built in stages between 1806 and 1813 by the Board of Ordnance for the Arsenal Storekeeper's Department. The design has been attributed to James Wyatt, architect to the Ordnance Board, and his brother Lewis. The elevations are expensively built, with stock brick generously dressed with stone. Constructionally the buildings are conservative, looking back to the naval storehouses of the 18th century, making no use of structural iron [which was beginning to be employed at this time by Rennie and Alexander in the major warehouse complexes at the London and West India Docks only a few miles away upstream]. Architecturally the elevations adopt an idiosyncratic classical language employing giant pilasters with distinctly unusual fluted capitals. The buildings were erected on piled foundations and started to suffer from settlement almost immediately, requiring partial rebuilding and repairs throughout their operational lives. Further underpinning work is currently being carried out.
The Grand Store served as the general depot for the army and navy for items such as entrenching tools and harnesses as well as gun carriages and shot and shells. In 1855 it became the HQ of the Ordnance Store Department. The storage capacity of the complex proved insufficient, leading to the covering over of the outer quadrangles in 1856-8 and the erection of four farther ranges, including the two storehouses. Buildings 47 & 48, built 1888-9 and c.1890, on the former shot yard of the central quadrangle.

BUILDING 4 [Formerly a timber shed].
Erected circa 1856 as a timber storage shed for the Ordnance Store Department. Single-storey, iron-framed. A good example of the iron framing techniques being used in the Arsenal at this period. It has seven bays, with octagonal-section cast iron columns. The columns were cast with brackets to receive four rails, possibly relating to racking for storing or seasoning timber. Open-spandrel eliptical-arched girders span between the columns and the original composite iron roof trusses survive. Possibly originally open-sided. Later walling and fenestration has recently been removed, as has a 3-bay 20th. Century  extension to the south.

MIDDLE GATE HOUSE & THE MIDDLE GATE.
Built 1809 for the Arsenal's Storekeeper, who had formerly lived in the Royal Military Academy. Located close to the timber yards that then occupied that part of the site. A double-fronted, stock brick building of three storeys, with a central Greek Doric porch, now enclosed. The top storey may be a later 19th. Century addition. The house takes its present name from its proximity to a now disused entrance to the Arsenal opened in 1843 as the Plumstead Gate. This was later renamed the Middle Gate
when the Arsenal expanded eastwards. The south boundary wall in which the gateway is formed dates possibly from circa 1800. The gateway has four large piers of rusticated masonry flanking two pedestrian side gates and a wider central opening. The gates, until recently hidden behind steel sheeting , are now, disappointingly, revealed to be of modern steelwork.

TELEPHONE EXCHANGE [Building 21].
A three storey polychrome brick building erected as Naval Offices in 1890. The upper storey was added in 1903. The windows are round-arched and the elevational treatment is
very similar to the Chemical Laboratory. Subsequently converted to serve as the Arsenal's telephone exchange  but the telephone equipment has been removed.

BUILDING 19 [Formerly Mounting Ground, later Carriage Inspection Shed].
Built 1887 for the Royal Carriage Department. Replaced an iron mounting and painting shed of circa 1856-7 on the same site. This is the building in which guns were mounted onto their carriages.
Drawings for the building are signed by Colonel H. Crozier, Inspector of Works, and George Munday & Sons, building contractors. A single storey shed with three separately roofed ranges. The stock brick exterior has pairs
of round-arched window openings in relieving arches further articulated by plain pilaster strips. The slated roofs have gable ends and skylights along the ridges.
Internally the ranges are separated by tall hollow cylindrical cast iron columns bearing the name of John Lysacht Ltd of Bristol and the date 1887, which support the valley girders.
The two main ranges have clear floors served by overhead travelling cranes. These run on the original gantries though the cranes themselves are replacements. The roofs have steel principals and struts and wrought iron ties.

BUILDINGS 47& 48 [formerly Storehouse and Sea Store].
Two large warehouses forming part of the programme of enlarging the Grand Store's capacity, located on what was formerly the shot yard of the central quadrangle
Building 47: Warehouse, built circa 1890. Three storeys, of stock brick. 17 bays by 4, with giant pilaster strips. In the central 3 bays of the long elevations are two 2-storey
round-arched carriage entrances, reduced in 1967 when the building was adapted as a book store. The 4th and 14th bays on each side originally contained loopholes but the loading doors have been replaced with windows and the hoists removed. The windows are mostly replacements of 1967. The interior has timber floors on cast iron columns.
Building 48: Warehouse, built 1888-90 as a Sea Store. Three storey , yellow stock brick structure with hipped, slated roof. 17 bays by 3, with giant pilaster strips and round-headed window openings on the ground and first floors with cast iron window frames. Timber floors on hollow cylindrical cast iron columns.

Greenwich Foot Tunnel Anniversary

$
0
0

GREENWICH FOOT TUNNEL ANNIVERSARY


At 1l am on Sunday 4 August, 2002, a small ceremony was held to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the opening  of the Greenwich Foot Tunnel. This occasion was almost overlooked, but for the sleuthing work of Barry Mason, a local bicycle campaigner, and co-ordinator of Greenwich cyclists. Barry discovered by accident the birthday of the tunnel and contacted Greenwich and Tower Hamlets councils to see if any official event was happening to celebrate the occasion. On being told that there was no interest from the local authorities at either end of the tunnel, he contacted the consulting engineers Binnie Black and Veach, who are the successors to Sir Alexander Binnie, the original designer of the tunnel.

Fortunately, Binnie Black and Veach have an enthusiastic PR department and they arranged a ceremony in co-operation with Mr Mason. Greenwich and Tower Hamlets councils then jumped on board. A small stage was erected nearby the southern entrance to the tunnel, standing in the shadow of the Cutty Sark. During a sudden downpour of rain Chris Binnie, great grandson of Sir Alexander and himself a retired engineer specialising in water supply, gave an excellent, very funny speech. He dressed for the occasion in the style of his great grandfather, including a stovepipe hat and pearl tie pin.
Watched by a crowd of puzzled tourists, the group, including 20 or so cyclists from Barry's cyclist group, representatives from Binnie Black and Veach, and the great and good from both borough councils, retired to the Greenwich University hall for a champagne lunch, compliments of the engineers.
The following extract is taken from an information pack handed out on the day:
The tunnel was opened in August 1902, and was built to replace the ferry services that were causing congestion on that particularly busy part of the Thames, The ferry provided an essential link to the docks for many workers who lived south of the river. At the time there was no free crossing from Tower Bridge to the Woolwich ferry. The terry was also subject to weather delay, and at the time a ferry fare cost a workman half his day's wages.
The tunnel was designed by Alexander Binnie, and work commenced under his guidance in June 1899 by Messrs John Cochrane and Co at a proposed cost of £109,500.
Two shafts were sunk to depths of 44 and 50ft, the shafts are 1,217ft apart. The cast-iron tunnel was bored using a trap/box style shield, with an external diameter of 12ft 9in. 12,000 cubic yards of earth were excavated. Workers operating in the compressed air environment were examined once a week, by a doctor. A medical lock was constructed for cases of 'cassion sickness' but was only used twice. Progress was at a rate of 5ft 6in per day, 33ft per week for 36 weeks. The tunnel is made of cast-iron segments, lined with concrete and faced with 200,000 white glazed tiles. 1,670 tons of cast iron was used and 700 tons of steel. Lifts were built in 1904 at either end and were still in use until their upgrade in 1992 The tunnel is a quarter mile long, and lies 53ft below the high-water mark and 33ft below the low-water mark, there are 88 steps on the Isle of Dogs side and 100 on the Greenwich side, the tunnel at its steepest has a gradient of 1 in 15.
The final capital expenditure on the project was just under £180,000 and compensation was paid to the water (ferry operators) of £100 each for lost business when the tunnel opened.
Binnie received a knighthood from Queen Victoria for his part in the tunnels construction. With Sir Benjamin Baker he promoted the reconstruction of London's main drainage system and completed the sewage treatment works at Barking and Crossness. In 1905 he was elected president of the Institution of Civil Engineers, and in 1906 designed the Vauxhall Bridge. In 1913 he published 'Rainfall, Reservoirs and Water Supply' The business went through a number of name changes. In 1909 Sir Alexander Binnie and Son merged with Deacon & Sons to Form Sir Alexander Binnie, Son and Deacon and the same year they undertook a water supply project at Kalgoorlie in Australia, their first major overseas work. 1922 they designed and supervised the Gunong Pulai dam in Singapore 1930 design and supervision of Gorge dam in Hong Kong. In 1995 the practice was by then known as Binnie and Partners, and it merged with Black and Veach of the USA, to form Binnie Black and Veach. Today the company is a large engineering and management consultancy with an annual turnover of $2.3bn, employing 9.000 in 100 offices worldwide. '
Following the event, the cyclists left Greenwich and made a 20-mile round trip down river to the Woolwich tunnel, they went through and then came back toward London where they ate tea and cake in Island Gardens, before finally riding into the Greenwich tunnel one last time and singing it happy birthday.
Gary Cummins Adapted fromGLIAS NEWSLETTER  202, October 2002 without permission.


Reviews and snippets January 2003

$
0
0


Reviews and snippets January 2003

BLACKHEATH GUIDE
The December 2002 issue includes an article by Peter Kent in his River Watch series. He talks about all the changes, which have come in to the area in that time – and includes his usual wonderful illustrations.  In the same issue Neil Rhind does his best with Jack the Ripper – was Jack a Blackheath man called Montague John Druitt?

GLIAS NEWSLETTER NO 203
The newsletter has quite a bit of Greenwich interest  - some bits reproduced elsewhere without permission. There is also a series of notes by Bob Carr about the river based around trips in the Gravesend area. He notes that SS Sheildhall was at Tilbury in November (she is an ex-Glasgow sludge carrier now based in Southampton).  He also mentions a derelict steamship in Gravesend Canal Basin and asks for information.   Bob Rust describes the GLIAS cruise along the Gravesend riverside – Henley’s riverside cable works reminded him of ‘visions of Greenwich, loading at Lovells’s or Badcock's and watching the cable snaking out of Submarine Cables Ltd. Into the ship lying alongside Enderbys. The place, I was told that the first trans-Atlantic cable was made’.

Fourth Annual Report from the Greenwich Maritime Institute. The Institute has continued to flourish with a postgraduate programme and has hosted the Maritime World Conference and the report gives details of activities of staff and students in this period.

Kent Underground Research Group Newsletter No.75 December 2002. Contains an article by Mary Mills on the Blackheath Hole.

Heritage Today – December 2002. This is the magazine for the members of English heritage.  This contains an article by GIHS member Malcolm Tucker on ‘Monuments in Metal’ – gasholders.  This outlines Malcolm’s report on gasholders for English Heritage – but does not mention our own holder at East Greenwich (which, together with its predecessor at Old Kent Road is the subject of a great deal of the original report on the grounds of its importance as a ground breaking structure).




CONVOY'S WHARF RECOLLECTIONS – Bob Rust
(Reproduced from GLIAS Newsletter)

I regularly loaded paper out of Convoy's (GLIAS Newsletter 200, pi 1) and was surprised that no mention was made of the huge almost semi-circular building, like a Nissen hut but nearly 100 feet across. We were always told that it was a listed building and was the slaughterhouse of the cattle market. On the right just inside the gate were the sheds that replaced some destroyed in the 1940 Blitz. These had a plaque commemorating their building.
When I first started loading from there, there were several ranges of beautifully built yellow stock brick buildings, apparently left over from its days as the Royal Navy Victualling Yard. When these were demolished by Convoy's to expand the wharf, the demolition contractor took the bricks as payment for the job. The unique one was the 30ft square windowless building used as a gear store. This had walls about 5ft feet thick, a massive steel door and a corrugated iron roof. We were told that this was the powder magazine and was constructed so that if there were an accidental explosion the blast would go straight up. There was also a large open area where a shed had been destroyed by arson during the newspaper strike. On the downstream end was the decorative wharf front of Payne's with its name built into the pediment. While behind that was the range of buildings, which the dockers called Nelson's House (which is of course at Woolwich) but which seem to fit the description of the workhouse built on the site of Sayes Court. There is also the connection with Peter the Great and Queen Elizabeth I and Sir Francis Drake.

LONDON RIVERS ASSOCIATION– this organization, which was Greenwich based until very recently, has launched a sheet on which people are invited to note things of concern on the riverside and report to the association.  Please contact Mary on 0208 858 9482 for details of LRA and their new contact address..


THE HEATH Neil Rhind’s popular history and guidebook to Blackheath has been revised and updated for 2003.
 This history – the definitive story of 1,000 years of recorded events, and based on primary sources, not legend and hearsay - has remained in print for many years but was last revised in 1985. The new edition published on 7 December 2002 brings the story up-to-date.
The author separates fact from fiction in the story of the ancient underground caverns and chalk pits as well as more modern structures, like the soon-to-be-restored Heathkeeper’s Lodge and the Gibb Memorial shelter. He nails (once again) the nonsense that Blackheath was named after the so-called Black Death of 1349 and demonstrates that the name was in the record by the 12th century – 200 years before the pestilence.

OUR REVIEWER WRITES: 
This fascinating work by the acknowledged authority on Blackheath is a rewrite of his  earlier study.  Lavishly illustrated, this book deals with principal events and buildings around the Heath and much else besides.
Although not obviously an industrial area readers will discover that besides sand and gravel extraction there were mills, a brewery and a laundry industry. In addition to architecture there is plenty to interest students of crime, sports and entertainment not to mention military history and public administration.
Those who attended Harry Pearman’s recent talk on the caverns below the Point will find references and illustrations.
Thoroughly recommended to all with an interest in the history of the area.
Alan Mills

Letters January 2003

$
0
0
Letters January  2003


From Philip Davies, Director, English  Heritage London Region
I enclose for your attention a copy of Changing London: An Historic City for a Modern World, which we are distributing widely. Changing London highlights the crucial contribution London's historic environment makes to people's quality of life and to the capital's economy. We must stop polarizing the old and the new. London's future lies in the successful integration of both into the daily lives of the 7.5 million people who live and work in this great city. The publication coincides with the release of a MORI poll commissioned by English Heritage which asks Londoners about their views on London's historic environment. It is clear that it enjoys enormous public support. People care deeply about it. English Heritage is a facilitator in enabling change. Conservation is about managing, not preventing, change. One of our key aims is to encourage a creative dialogue between conservation and developers.
We believe that the best new buildings arise from understanding and valuing the historic environment. Conservation does not inhibit good new architecture; it provides a framework within which it can flourish. This was demonstrated by the recent RIBA London Awards where 11 of the 14 award winning schemes were for new buildings in an historic context.

From Pat O’Driscoll
Some more comments on Mary Mills’ new book Greenwich and Woolwich at Work.
p. 24 – Norton’s Barge Yard – Norton’s survived into the 1960s. Dick closed it in 1966 but he continued to go down there most days. 
p 28 – the bottom picture was taken by me on 27th October 1954. It might be possible to identify the barge hulk being broken up in this picture of Garrett’s Barge Breakers.
The bottom picture on page 71 was taken by me on 22ndSeptember 1954. The mast shown outside Enderby House on the Greenwich riverside and said to come from the Great Eastern was made of wood – it was the only one of her masts, which was wood because it was used to mount the ship’s compass above the magnetic field of the ship.  The other masts were of hollow steel and formed funnels for the ship’s auxiliaries (steam steering engine, etc.)
The picture on p. 105 was taken on 22nd May 1972.
The picture of Tower Julie on p. 15 was taken on April 3rd1972. She was then discharging a cargo of maize and it was her very first voyage.
The pictures of old Deptford Creek Bridge are interesting. It’s the first one I’ve seen. The gang of men had to remove the rails so that the bridge could open just 14 inches (I’m told), which would just permit the passage of a ship’s mast if the ship was steered very accurately. 
P. 65 – note the solid front tyres of that lorry. These would date the picture from the early 1920s before pneumatic tyres came on the scene.
p. 35 that barge alongside Woolwich power station looks as if she is a steel one, possibly one of Goldsmith’s. She would be a river barge rather than a coasting barge because on bowsprit can be seen. Coasting barges generally had a bowsprit. I can’t think what sort of bales she would be discharging here. The crane has an iron bucket rather than a grab, which would seem to rule out coal, which one would be more likely to find being discharged at a power station. A bit of a mystery here! I’d like to show the picture to Bob Childs, who might well know the answer.
p. 102 I think the reason why no books can be seen on the shelves in Plumstead Library is that most public libraries in the early past of the 20thcentury were closed access ones where the books were out of signs and would be borrowers chose a book from number in a catalogue and the assistant fetched. Some libraries had a big board with details of books and a number beside each book. The libraries I used to work at (Forest Hill branch dating from 1900) only went over to open access in 1932 so that the books were on shelves as they are in today’s libraries. The branch librarian who had been in post since 1920 told me about the changeover.

From Bob Aspinall, Museum in Docklands

I am taking this opportunity to update friends and colleagues on the latest news regarding the Museum in Docklands (MiD), which is as follows:-
The Museum in Docklands ran in to financial problems earlier this year, due to the escalating cost of converting this magnificent Grade I Listed warehouse into a museum capable of accommodating the demands of 150,000 visitors a year. The only way that the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) would bail us out was to bring about a merger between MiD and the Museum of London (MoL): this was based on the premise that most of the collections which would be displayed at MiD already belong to MoL, together with the contents of the Docklands Library & Archive. The MoL agreed to the merger on the understanding that a funding package could be put together to take on MiD and run it in the future. This funding package has three components:- the HLF: the Department of Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS): and the Corporation of London (CoL). At the moment, DCMS and CoL support the MoL on a 50/50 basis. All the support has to be "new money"- the MoL cannot run MiD out of its existing budget. So far, HLF has coughed up, DCMS has put in some money but not as much as was originally hoped, but the CoL has so far refused to make a  contribution. This failure has caused the announcement of the merger between the two museums to be put back twice, in November and December. It has also meant that the plans to recruit 40 new staff to run MiD have had to be suspended. The job adverts have been issued: hundreds of people have applied: shortlists have been made: but job interviews scheduled to take place in the first full week in January have been postponed.
Meanwhile, the staff here is continuing to work on getting the MiD ready for opening. As many of you will know, the displays in the galleries are about 90% complete, the lecture theatre is operational and the Library & Archive is in place. But the reluctance of the CoL to put money on the table means that the merger will be delayed at least until the next MoL Board meeting in January. Despite that, the MoL remains confident that it can still achieve the scheduled opening date of the 12th April 2003. However, if the CoL fails to commit to its share of the funding in January, the opening date will have to be put back once again. I am sure you can imagine the effect that all this is having on the MiD staff- 2002 has been a bleak year for all of us. Merger with the MoL is now the only option left open to MiD if it wants to open to the public. Let us hope that the current problems will be resolved soon and we can at long last deliver this wonderful museum. All I can say to you is, watch this space!

From James Purtill
Your November newsletter includes a letter from Michael Cooke regarding the electric telegraph and submarine cables. I worked in the submarine cable industry for some years and I have some information which could be helpful. I have a copy of a book entitled "From Elektron to 'e' Commerce - 150 Years of Laying Submarine Cables" which was jointly produced in 2000 by Global Marine Systems Ltd. (address: 27 Duke Street, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 1HT) and Alcatel Submarine Networks of Greenwich. It is possible that copies could be available from these companies. The book includes some information about submarine cable manufacture at Greenwich among a lot of historical detail about the development of the industry. Technical detail about telegraph cable manufacture and laying should be available from the Porthcurno telecommunications museum in Cornwall. Their website (http//www.porthcurno. org.uk/ museum/ mdex.html) includes details of equipment in the museum and a few relevant books. I presume Alcatel must have some old records but I am not sure.
Finally, Captain Glyn Wrench at the National Maritime Museum at Greenwich will be able to assist. He spent a lifetime working on Cable & Wireless vessels and is an expert and an enthusiast on the subject. He would be delighted to hear from anybody with an interest in the industry. I hope this is helpful.

From Barbara Ludlow
My Billingsgate Dock article should be in Bygone Kent next month.  Did you hear Julian Watson (Greenwich Local History Librarian) and Eve Hostettler (Island History Project) talking about the Greenwich Foot Tunnel on ‘Making History’ this week?
More to the point – who heard Barbara herself talking about Enderby House on the same programme a couple of weeks ago?


From Malcolm Tucker
You had a query from Kay Bigsby (GIHS p.7) about an engine driver or building worker c. 1900 (presumably the father of the person on the birth certificate!).  He might have tended a portable engine for driving machinery such as a mortar mixer on a large site. But supporting it was a railway locomotive engine – I enclose a copy of an article on contractors’ railways  by Edwin Course (1992). Although these were used mainly on civil engineering works the article mentions mental hospitals, and after World War One when productivity became of greater concern to the building industry these were used on large housing contracts both public and private. The sites did not have to be connected to the mainline system, nor large in area, a recent article in another journal described the use of a standard gauge loco for constructing the water works service reservoir at Fortis Green nears Muswell Hill, N10 , in the Edwardian period.  By the nature of the construction industry a worker would need to move from site to site, so he may not have worked close to home except occasionally.
Those with past connections with the Royal Arsenal Woolwich are usually eager to point out ‘Woolwich Arsenal ‘ is the railway station – but your note from Peter Wood (GIHS 5 pp 8-9) states that some bronze memorial plaques manufactured at the Arsenal in the 1920s are marked ‘WA’ Any comments?
The article which  Malcolm sent is from the Construction History Society Newsletter No.19 April 1992. 

From Jim Arthur
I read and enjoyed Mary Mills’ book ‘Greenwich and Woolwich at Work’. I am interested in Merryweather and sons I would like to be put in touch with anyone who has a collection of pictures. I saw many photos in old bound copies of London Fireman. I regret I did not grab the opportunity of acquiring these, as some were priceless.  Just also to say that on p. 10 of the book is the ‘Woolwich Infant’ – authorities differ on this, I would say a muzzle loader had to be a smooth bore, but on p.51 a similar gun shows feint rifling marks at the muzzle !!!

From Brian Molony
This letter comes from the University of Hull on the banks of the Humber to Humber Road. I hope that is a good omen! I am Emeritus Professor of Italian at the University of Hull and have written two books and a number of articles on the Italian writer Italo Svevo (1861-1928). With Prof. John Gatt-Rutter, who has written a biography of Svevo, I am now preparing an edition of Svevo's letters and essays from/about London. You no doubt know the English Heritage blue plaque at 67 Church Lane, Charlton  (which for some reason omits to say that he also lived there from 1920 to 1927). Italo Svevo was the pseudonym of Ettore Schmitz, who worked for the paint firm of his parents-in law, Gioacchino and Olga Veneziani. He set up the Veneziani factory in Hope & Anchor Lane. I am now looking for information about the factory - even, ideally, a photograph of it - as well as some of Svevo's neighbours, such as Richards, the owner of the factory or workshop next door, whom Svevo mentions in his essays. I shall be very grateful if you can draw the attention of your members to our project, which I think will be of interest to them, and to our need for some help. Is there also a Charlton Local History Society you could put me in touch with? 

From Peter Solar

For some years I have been collecting information on flax, hemp, and jute spinning mills in the U.K. I wonder if you or any of the members of the Society might be able to tell me more about a mill in Greenwich. What I have found to date is summarized below:
Factory Inspectors' Statistics for flax, hemp and jute mills in Kent -  1839 1, 1850 1, 1857 0, 1862 0, 1867 0, 1871 0,
1905 1 (hemp)
In 1839 factory inspectors' statistics the mill is in Greenwich parish and has 40 hands (but no sign of it in Pigot's directory for 1840) In 1855 sale auction: twine sp & prep machinery of Hemp Works, East Greenwich, near London; 10 sp fr; 15 twisting fr (Dundee Advertiser, 24/7/55).
Enderby, C.H. & G. (38, 39) (not 24, 51) New East Greenwich and 15 Great St Helens, London Founded:1834
Closed: Product:
Notes: In Pigot's London & Provincial Directory for 1833 new entry for 1834 is Enderby Bros, rope & canvas mfrs, 15 Great St Helens. In 1837 listed in London as merchants at 15 Great St Helens. In 1839 flax spinning mills & patent rope makers. In 1845 Charles, Henry & George Enderby, rope & canvas mfrs. Spindles:
I suspect that the advertisement cited above refers to the Enderby concern. I would be interested to know whether this mill was newly constructed or converted from some other use and what became of the site after hemp spinning was stopped in the early 1850s.
Professor of Economics, Vesalius College, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels   

From Jay Edwins

Hello, I wonder if you can help me settle a friendly argument! 1 believe that the Blackwall Tunnel has major bends in it for engineering reasons. My chum, however, insists that it was built like this so horses would not bolt when they saw daylight. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.


From Glyn in Tasmania

Hi everyone, I am researching the building of the Lady Nelson in Dudmans Dock in 1798 Some reports refer to Deadmans Dock. Are these the same place? Any information would be most welcome.

 

From Bob Forrester

General Steam Navigation Co. and its Deptford Factory:

You may recall that I contacted you some time back concerning my research at the Greenwich Maritime Institute into General Steam and, specifically, my interest in its Deptford Factory ship repair and engine building facility on the banks of Deptford Creek.

I wonder if a mention in your up-coming newsletter may yield some leads. I have visited both the Greenwich and Lewisham libraries and made contact with Peter Gurnett who produced a booklet, A History of the GSNCo., a couple of years ago. I have been thoroughly through the GSNCo. archive in the National Maritime Museum and also looked through the limited material available at the Museum in Docklands. I have also had a chat with Alan Pearsall. Any leads or information your members may be able to offer concerning the Factory or relating to the Brockelbank family which was resident in Westcombe Park will be greatly appreciated. (Thomas Brockelbank, a timber merchant, was closely involved with the company from the 1820s.)


From Tony Wright
I am researching William Harding, Gent, Merchant of Greenwich, Kent. Born in Poole, Hampshire he subsequently married into a Barbados Plantation family. He had two sons, William and John. John at some stage lived in Greenwich and inherited plantations. John died around1718. His father William died 1707. Any info. would be most welcome.

From: Dennis Grubb
Can you find someone who would be able to research News Papers about 1905 or so for information on a court case and subsequent closure of the Cemetery Brickyard in Southland Road Plumstead which was run by my ancestors at that time.Please advise what they would want me to pay
Dennis Grubb, Adelaide South Australia


From Ian Sharpe
We have updated http://www.tower-bridge.org.uk and trust you will find many useful links to explore, do let us know what you think about our site by e-mail, or you can sign our visitor Guestbook and even link your URL there.
Best wishes for the festive season....
 Chair of LEA Heritage Community Group

From Reg, Jacqui and Lorna Barter

It appears that we are the custodians of the only Merryweather Firepumps left in Greenwich (in Massey Shaw)!
(well Reg … there’s a mysterious valve cover in Vanburgh Hill with ‘Merryweather’ written on it …. What lies beneath?)

Will Crooks

$
0
0
Will Crooks MP, local activist and Labour pioneer


By Paul Tyler

2003 marks the 100th anniversary of the by-election on 11 March, of Will Crooks, as the first Labour MP for Woolwich, and the fourth member of the Labour Representation Committee (LRC).  He was a member of the Philanthropic Coopers’ Union, which amalgamated to the NUGMW (GMB) in February 1924.  Also he was a leading member that helped set up the Woolwich Labour Party on 31 March 1903, and campaigned for the implementation of independent Labour representation throughout the country.  Crooks travelled 50,000 miles in 1904/5 speaking and educating working people on why they should support the Labour cause.   He was a significant Labour pioneer: ‘A Servant of the People.’ Crooks was a member of the Coopers’ Union for fifty-four years 1867-1921, and was Chairman of the Woolwich Labour Party 1910-1918.  J. R.  Clynes MP said of him: ‘No man of his time did more to awaken the conscience of the nation upon social conditions; he pleaded the cause of the poor on all manner of platforms, as well as in Parliament.’ 

Crooks was the first LRC candidate to win a straight fight against a Conservative in a single seat constituency.  His victory in Woolwich was the first example of what could be achieved in a Tory stronghold without Liberal opposition.  It accelerated the electoral success of Labour, and became pivotal in the Lib-Lab electoral pact in September 1903.  The pact in turn laid the ground for the anti-Tory landslide general election of 1906.  Crooks’ victory should be seen as the beginning of Labour’s rise as an electoral force of political significance.  The Woolwich election result marked the beginning of Labour’s rise electorally, and had a lasting political importance on the pattern and style of future elections throughout the country.  The advent of Labour threatened the electoral supremacy of both the Liberals and the Conservatives by influencing decisions that sought to change the balance of power within the bounds of national politics. 
Will Crooks was born in a one-roomed home on 6 April 1852, at 2 Shirbutt Street, Poplar, not far from Gough Street, where he lived until his death in 1921.  He was the third of seven children, the son of George and Charlotte Crooks.  He was born into poverty, and his early years were dominated by want and sorrow.  To make things worse, when Crooks was three years old, his father, who was a ship’s stoker, lost his arm in a steamship accident.  ‘We were so poor’, he said, ‘that we children never got a drop of tea for months together.  It used to be bread and treacle for breakfast, dinner and tea, washed down with a glass of water.’ When Crooks was nine years old he was put into Poplar workhouse along with his disabled father and brothers and sisters.   His mother remained outside the workhouse with the eldest and youngest of the children. Three weeks after entering the workhouse he was sent with his younger brother to a Poor Law School.  Years later he recalled, ‘every day spent in that school is burnt into my soul.’  In addition he said, ‘I may truly say that I commenced my acquaintance with the outside world by entering the workhouse door!’   Thirty-five years later Crooks became Chairman of the Poplar Board of Guardians, the very board that had given him and his brothers and sisters shelter at that youthful stage and dark times of their lives.
Crooks’ work in regard to the Poor Law was perhaps the most important phase in his life.  He was different from other Poor Law reformers in that he spoke from experience.  He had seen the system from the inside.  His bitter encounter with the Poor Law in early childhood had filled him with the resolve to bring about its change; especially in the way it treated children.   Concerns with the issues surrounding poverty served to give Crooks the justification to agitate for trade union and political action for the abolition of long hours, sweating, all forms of overwork, conditions of privation, and its corollary unemployment.  These in essence were the convictions that underpinned Crooks’ political life 1887-1921.

From the mid 1880s until the early 1900s, Tory businessmen dominated Woolwich civic life, being in control of the local vestries, the Board of Works, and subsequently the Borough Council.  Edwin Hughes, who held the Woolwich parliamentary seat 1885-1902, was a local solicitor and magistrate.  Also, in this period the alliance between the trade unions and the Liberal Party weakened,q and finally withered away.  Because of the demise of the Liberals, the Tories were able to fill the political vacuum, and
win workingmen to their cause.  Crooks helped break Woolwich’s political and geographic isolation, and thus the Tories hold on the district.  He not only helped to politicise the workingmen of Woolwich though, but he was also instrumental in providing them with better access to work.  Crooks was at the forefront of the campaign to build a tunnel at Blackwall, the opening of which in 1896 had a significant social and political impact upon the Woolwich district.  Also, while he was Chairman of the LCC Bridges Committee (1898), he oversaw a scheme to provide foot-tunnels underneath the Thames between Greenwich and the Isle of Dogs and Woolwich and Silvertown; the later providing an alternative to the ferry.  The foot-tunnels opened in 1902.  In addition, it is worth remembering, Crooks was on the LCC Woolwich Ferry subcommittee. Therefore, most workers who voted for him in 1903 were aware that Crooks had influenced improvements in their daily life, whether they had to travel over the river to work, or attend trade union/ political meetings. 
Crooks saw that unemployment and low pay were a major cause of poverty, and he emphasized the issues surrounding unemployment and the minimum wage.  He believed that the Government of the day should be made responsible for poverty, and played a significant role in placing unemployment and low pay before the House of Commons.  The Unemployed Workmen Act of 1905, and the implementation of a minimum wage by the Blair Government in 1999, is part of Crooks’ enduring legacy to industrial relations.  Also of significance were his contributions in the creation of Labour Exchanges to deal with the unemployed, and the payment of old age pensions to workingmen.  Crooks played a leading role in calling for Government intervention in the feeding of schoolchildren.  He spoke in support of a Bill, which provided for the feeding of necessitous school children.  It was eventually passed in December 1906.  After 1945, with the onset of the Welfare State, free school milk and a national network of school meals provision came into being - a measure Crooks had campaigned for since the 1890s.   The provision of school meals highlighted for Crooks the relationship between poverty, low pay, unemployment, education and poor housing conditions, which he believed were all contibutory and important factors in determining poverty.

It is important to recognize that Crooks was an important Labour figure, and that his experiences in both Poplar and Woolwich influenced his judgment on the wider issues of unemployment, low pay and poverty.  Thus his local knowledge of the needs and interests of his constituents informed his national outlook, enabling him to make better assessments because of his strengths as a local MP.   


Viewing all 561 articles
Browse latest View live